Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 23;15:15. doi: 10.1186/s13048-022-00947-9

Table 3.

Comparison of IOTA Simple Rules and O-RADS with histopathological findings and malignancy rates in the categories of two ultrasound classification systems

US Classification Systems Total No.(%) n = 453 Histopathological Result Calculated malignancy rate (%) p
Benign n = 184 Malignant n = 269
IOTA Simple Rules <0.001
 Benign 147 (32.45) 132 (71.74) 15 (5.57) 10.20
 Malignant 229 (50.55) 20 (10.87) 209 (77.70) 91.27
 Inconclusive 77 (17.00) 32 (17.39) 45 (16.73) 58.44
O-RADS <0.001
 O-RADS 2 78 (17.22) 74 (40.22) 4 (1.49) 5.13
 O-RADS 3 59 (13.02) 48 (26.09) 11 (4.09) 18.64
 O-RADS 4 134 (29.58) 52 (28.26) 82 (30.48) 61.19
 O-RADS 5 182 (40.18) 10 (5.43) 172 (63.94) 94.50

IOTA International Ovarian Tumor Analysis, O-RADS Ovarian Adnexal Reporting and Data System