Table 19.
Statistical comparison of the ranks obtained from DM weight sensitivity analysis
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Av. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.000 | 0.964 | 0.964 | 1.000 | 0.964 | 0.988 | 0.988 | 0.855 | 0.891 | 0.961 |
| 2 | – | 1.000 | 0.964 | 0.964 | 1.000 | 0.964 | 0.988 | 0.988 | 0.855 | 0.891 | 0.957 |
| 3 | – | – | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.964 | 0.964 | 0.988 | 0.952 | 0.903 | 0.806 | 0.947 |
| 4 | – | – | – | 1.000 | 0.964 | 0.964 | 0.988 | 0.952 | 0.903 | 0.806 | 0.940 |
| 5 | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | 0.964 | 0.988 | 0.988 | 0.855 | 0.891 | 0.948 |
| 6 | – | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | 0.952 | 0.988 | 0.915 | 0.867 | 0.944 |
| 7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | 0.964 | 0.867 | 0.842 | 0.918 |
| 8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | 0.879 | 0.903 | 0.927 |
| 9 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | 0.806 | 0.903 |
| 10 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.000 | 1.000 |