Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 2;2(1):79–85. doi: 10.34067/KID.0006282020

Table 1.

Attitudes toward and comfort level with urine microscopy

Survey Question All, n=59 Postgraduate Year 1, n=18 Postgraduate Year 2, n=25 Postgraduate Year 3, n=16 P Value
How helpful do you think urine microscopy is?
 Very helpful (5) 30 (51%) 8 (47%) 15 (58%) 7 (44%)
 Somewhat helpful (4) 24 (41%) 5 (29%) 10 (38%) 9 (56%)
 Neutral (3) 5 (9%) 4 (24%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%)
 Not very helpful (2) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 Not at all helpful (1) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 Mean (SD) 4.4 (0.7) 4.3 (0.8) 4.6 (0.6) 4.4 (0.5) 0.41
How comfortable do you feel performing urine microscopy?
 Very comfortable (5) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 Somewhat comfortable (4) 7 (12%) 1 (6%) 3 (12%) 3 (19%)
 Neutral (3) 8 (14%) 1 (6%) 6 (23%) 1 (6%)
 Not very comfortable (2) 18 (31%) 3 (18%) 8 (30%) 7 (44%)
 Not at all comfortable (1) 26 (44%) 12 (70%) 9 (35%) 5 (31%)
 Mean (SD) 1.9 (1.1) 1.5 (0.9) 2.2 (0.2) 2.1 (1.1) 0.05
Have you ever performed urine microscopy?
 Yes 28 (48%) 6 (35%) 10 (38%) 12 (75%)
 No 29 (49%) 11 (65%) 15 (58%) 3 (19%)
 Not sure 2 (3%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 1 (6%)

Means between postgraduate year (PGY) groups were calculated and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn multiple comparisons post-test. Post-test analysis for “How helpful do you think urine microscopy is?”: PGY-1 versus PGY-2, P=0.80; PGY-1 versus PGY-3, P>0.99; PGY-2 versus PGY-3, P=0.80. Post-test for “How comfortable do you feel performing urine microscopy?”: PGY-1 versus PGY-2, P=0.05; PGY-1 versus PGY-3, P=0.30; PGY-2 versus PGY-3, P>0.99.