Table 3.
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Author | Aim of study | Country | Methodology | Period | Sample size | Outcome measures | Summary of findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thelin 2017 | To evaluate the Stockholm and Helsinki CT scores for predicting functional outcome, in comparison with the Rotterdam CT score and Marshall CT classification. To assess which individual components of the CT scores best predict outcome and what additional prognostic value the CT scoring systems contribute to a clinical prognostic model | United Kingdom | Prospective cohort | 2005–2014 | 1115 | • CT severity score as predictor of GOS | • TSAH was the most important component of the Stockholm and Helsinki CT scoring system for outcome prediction |
Matsushima 2015 | To investigate the relationship between time to surgery and outcomes in patients with isolated sTBI requiring an emergent neurosurgical intervention | USA | Prospective cohort | 2003 – 2013 | 161 | • Inhospital mortality | • Inhospital mortality rate: 34.5% (early) vs. 59.1% (late) • Neurosurgical intervention was significantly associated with a higher odds of patient survival |
Tu 2011 | To evaluate whether the maximum thickness of subarachnoid blood is an independent prognostic marker of mortality after TSAH | China | Prospective cohort | 2007–2010 | 104 | • 1-month mortality | • Maximum thickness of subarachnoid blood is a prognostic marker of 1-month mortality |
CT, computed tomography; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Score; sTBI, severe traumatic brain injuryt; TSAH: traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.