Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2021 Mar 15;258(6):616–629. doi: 10.2460/javma.258.6.616

Table 1—

Days postonset (DPO) of clinical signs for dogs with confirmed or probable leptospirosis (n = 52*) between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, in Maricopa County, Ariz, in which blood and urine samples were collected before or after antimicrobial administration for detection of Leptospira DNA by PCR assay.

PCR assay sample type and result All samples (n = 105) Samples collected prior to antimicrobial (n = 50) Samples collected after antimicrobial (n = 41)
No. (%) Median (range) DPO No. (%) Median (range) DPO No. (%) Median (range) DPO
Blood
 Positive 15 (29) 2.0 (0–8) 12 (46) 2.0 (0–8)§ 0 (0) 0
 Negative 37 (71) 8.0 (0–165) 14 (54) 7.0 (0–15)§ 19 (100) 26.5 (3–165)
Urine
 Positive 33 (62) 6.0 (0–128) 18 (75) 4.0 (0–15) 11 (50) 21.0 (4–128)
 Negative 20 (38) 7.5 (0–165) 6 (25) 2.0 (0–8) 11 (50) 27.0 (3–165)
*

4 dogs had samples collected for PCR assay at > 1 time point.

Excludes samples (n = 14) collected from 7 dogs with a record of antimicrobial prescription but without a recorded date of antimicrobial initiation.

Significantly (P < 0.01) different from each other.

§

Significantly (P < 0.05) different from each other.