Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 31;2021(12):CD003453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003453.pub2

Comparison 3. Lower lingual arch versus no active treatment (control).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Change in mandibular arch length 1 30 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.61 [1.83, 3.39]
3.2 Change in mandibular incisor A‐P position 1 30 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.46, 0.86]
3.3 Change in mandibular incisor inclination 1 30 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.01 [1.71, 4.31]
3.4 Change in mandibular molar A‐P position 1 30 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐1.11 [‐1.51, ‐0.71]
3.5 Change in mandibular molar inclination 1 30 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐2.73 [‐4.29, ‐1.17]