Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 31;2021(12):CD003453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003453.pub2

Atik 2014.

Study characteristics
Methods Setting: Department of Orthodontics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
Design: parallel (2 arms)
No. of centres: 1
Study duration: not reported. Mean treatment duration for intervention group 13.2 months and control group 15.3 months
Participants Inclusion criteria: “between 13 and 17 years of age at the start of the treatment, moderate maxillary and mandibular crowding, a Class I malocclusion, and a dentally constricted maxillary arch.”
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Participant sampling:
N = 33 selected
Group 1 (n = 17): 17 female (mean age of 14.5 + 1.2 years)
Group 2 (n = 16): 16 female (mean age of 14.8 + 1.0 years)
Sex: 100% female
Dropouts: none
Interventions Orthodontic intervention: fixed appliances and auxiliaries
Self‐ligating brackets versus conventional brackets
Outcomes Lower incisors to mandible, harms (discomfort, plaque index, gingival index and probing depth)
Notes Funding source not cited
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear method of randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear if allocation sequence concealed from those assigning patients to participant groups
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Not possible to blind participants and personnel due to the different interventions used
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "The pre‐treatment and post‐treatment lateral cephalograms of each patient were traced by one examiner."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No dropouts reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk None noted