Atik 2014.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Setting: Department of Orthodontics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey Design: parallel (2 arms) No. of centres: 1 Study duration: not reported. Mean treatment duration for intervention group 13.2 months and control group 15.3 months |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: “between 13 and 17 years of age at the start of the treatment, moderate maxillary and mandibular crowding, a Class I malocclusion, and a dentally constricted maxillary arch.” Exclusion criteria: not reported Participant sampling: N = 33 selected Group 1 (n = 17): 17 female (mean age of 14.5 + 1.2 years) Group 2 (n = 16): 16 female (mean age of 14.8 + 1.0 years) Sex: 100% female Dropouts: none |
|
Interventions | Orthodontic intervention: fixed appliances and auxiliaries Self‐ligating brackets versus conventional brackets |
|
Outcomes | Lower incisors to mandible, harms (discomfort, plaque index, gingival index and probing depth) | |
Notes | Funding source not cited | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear method of randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear if allocation sequence concealed from those assigning patients to participant groups |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not possible to blind participants and personnel due to the different interventions used |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "The pre‐treatment and post‐treatment lateral cephalograms of each patient were traced by one examiner." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No dropouts reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | None noted |