Gravina 2013.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Setting: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro Design: parallel (3 arms) No. of centres: 1 Study duration: 8 weeks |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: "presence of all erupted permanent teeth except for second and third molars; no previous orthodontic treatment; no indications for tooth extraction; overbite and overjet that allowed brackets to be placed on the lower teeth without occlusal interferences; level of crowding and teeth position that allowed a maximum deflection of 2 mm in the archwire when inserted in the bracket slots, and good conditions of oral hygiene and health". Exclusion criteria: not reported Participant sampling: N = 36 selected Group 1 (n = 11): sex and mean age of group not reported Group 2 (n = 12): sex and mean age of group not reported Group 3 (n = 13): sex and mean age of group not reported Overall age reported across groups: mean age of 14 ± 2 years Overall sex reported across both groups: 18 male, 18 female Dropouts: not reported |
|
Interventions | Orthodontic intervention: fixed appliances and auxiliaries Stainless steel versus multi stranded stainless steel versus nickel‐titanium |
|
Outcomes | Crowding | |
Notes | Funding source not cited | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear method of randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear if allocation sequence concealed from those assigning patients to participant groups |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not possible to blind participants and personnel due to the different interventions used |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear if assessor was blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Dropouts not reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Possible measurement bias |