Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 31;2021(12):CD003453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003453.pub2

Miles 2012.

Study characteristics
Methods Setting: Caloundra and University of Queensland Department of Orthodontics, Australia
Design: parallel (2 arms)
No. of centres: 1
Study duration: 10 weeks
Participants Inclusion criteria: "children aged between 11 to 15 years, a non‐extraction treatment plan in the lower arch, no impactions/unerupted teeth, fixed appliances bonded from first molar to first molar in both arches, and living locally to allow for additional appointments for impressions"
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Participant sampling:
N = 66 selected
Group 1 (n = 33 for irregularity, 31 for discomfort): 19 female, 14 male (mean age of 13.1 ± 0.18 years)
Group 2 (n = 33 for irregularity, 29 for discomfort): 21 female, 12 male (mean age of 13.0 ± 0.18 years)
Sex: 40 female, 26 male
Dropouts:
Group 1 = irregularity 0 (0%); discomfort 1 (4%)
Group 2 = irregularity 2 (6%); discomfort 1 (3%)
Interventions Orthodontic intervention: fixed appliances and auxiliaries
Vibrational appliance versus no vibrational appliance (control)
Outcomes Crowding, harms (discomfort)
Notes Funding source not cited
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear method of randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear if allocation sequence concealed from those assigning patients to participant groups
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Clinicians blinded, however not possible to blind participants due to the different interventions used
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Assessor blinded, however not possible to blind participants, who assessed their own pain levels, due to the different interventions used.
Quote: "A staff member who was blinded to the study groups and trained in the use of a micrometer measured the VAS data."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Low dropout rate
Quote: “Sixty‐six patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 64 patients reported for all 4 impression appointments. Pain scores were recorded by 60 patients, with 58 completing all 5 time points”
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk None identified