Table 2. Comparison between the two algorithms for 2D classification.
Selected particles | Time (hh:mm) | Resolution (Å) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EM | VDAM | EM | VDAM | EM | VDAM | |
TRPV1 | 250 182 | 203 740 | 03:26 | 00:50 | 3.2 | 3.3 |
-sec | 340 535 | 350 583 | 13:49 | 02:56 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
GDH | 476 531 | 476 559 | 05:01 | 00:51 | 2.5 | 2.4 |
CB1 | 587 385 | 500 473 | 12:18 | 02:46 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
INX6 | 88 855 | 89 141 | 02:04 | 00:28 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Good classes were selected manually, and the selected subset was further processed in auto-refine. The number of manually selected particles are shown for each data set and algorithm, as well as the execution time for 2D classification and the final resolution achieved with auto-refine using the subset from the respective subsets.