Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 16;478(24):4169–4185. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20210708

Table 2. Comparison between the two algorithms for 2D classification.

Selected particles Time (hh:mm) Resolution (Å)
EM VDAM EM VDAM EM VDAM
TRPV1 250 182 203 740 03:26 00:50 3.2 3.3
γ-sec 340 535 350 583 13:49 02:56 3.8 3.8
GDH 476 531 476 559 05:01 00:51 2.5 2.4
CB1 587 385 500 473 12:18 02:46 3.3 3.3
INX6 88 855 89 141 02:04 00:28 4.0 4.0

Good classes were selected manually, and the selected subset was further processed in auto-refine. The number of manually selected particles are shown for each data set and algorithm, as well as the execution time for 2D classification and the final resolution achieved with auto-refine using the subset from the respective subsets.