Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 11;31:e5. doi: 10.1017/S204579602100069X

Table 2.

Stepwise Cox proportional hazard regression for the individual contribution of cognitive activity, social memberships and social participation

Model Variable HR (s.e.) 95% CI p-Value
Model 1 Low number of cognitive activities [Reference]
High number of cognitive activities 0.47 (0.08) 0.33–0.67 <0.0011
Model 2 Low number of cognitive activities [Reference]
High number of cognitive activities 0.49 (0.09) 0.35–0.70 <0.0011
Model 3 Low number of cognitive activities [Reference]
High number of cognitive activities 0.54 (0.10) 0.37–0.78 0.0011
Model 4 Low number of cognitive activities [Reference]
High number of cognitive activities 0.58 (0.11) 0.40–0.84 0.0041
Model 1 Low number of social memberships [Reference]
High number of social memberships 0.56 (0.07) 0.44–0.72 <0.0011
Model 2 Low number of social memberships [Reference]
High number of social memberships 0.57 (0.07) 0.45–0.73 <0.0011
Model 3 Low number of social memberships [Reference]
High number of social memberships 0.61 (0.08) 0.47–0.78 <0.0011
Model 4 Low number of social memberships [Reference]
High number of social memberships 0.65 (0.09) 0.50–0.84 0.0011
Model 1 Low frequency of social participation [Reference]
High frequency of social participation 0.59 (0.08) 0.45–0.78 <0.0011
Model 2 Low frequency of social participation [Reference]
High frequency of social participation 0.61 (0.09) 0.46–0.81 0.0011
Model 3 Low frequency of social participation [Reference]
High frequency of social participation 0.65 (0.09) 0.49–0.86 0.0031
Model 4 Low frequency of social participation [Reference]
High frequency of social participation 0.71 (0.10) 0.54–0.95 0.0211

HR, hazard ratio; s.e., standard error; LIBRAadj, LIfestyle for BRAin health score without the weight for cognitive activity.

Model 1 = age and sex; Model 2 = model 1 + education; Model 3 = model 2 + wealth; Model 4 = model 3 + LIBRAadj.

1

Statistically significant at p≤0.05.