Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;31:e9. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000639

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studiesa

First author, year Country, Continent Design CHR-P sample size CHR-P subgroups Age: mean (s.d.), range [years] Sex: % female CHR-P assessment tools Total duration of follow-up [months] NOS
Addington et al. (2011) USA Longitudinal cohort 303 N.a. 18 (4.9), 12–36 44.0 SIPS/SOPS 30 4
Addington et al. (2019) Multi Longitudinal cohort 278 N.a. 18,8 (4.4) 44.4 SIPS/SOPS 24 4
Armando et al. (2015) Italy Longitudinal cohort 35 82.9% APS, 14.3% BLIPS, 11.4% GRD 13.8 (2.1), 9–17 48.6 SIPS/SOPS 12 5
Beck et al. (2019b) Switzerland Longitudinal cohort 255 N.a. 24.1 (8.2), 14–57 59.0 SIPS/SOPS 192 3
Cannon et al. (2015) Multi Longitudinal cohort 274 N.a. 19.6 (4.2) 37.6 SIPS/SOPS 12 5
Chen et al. (2016) China Longitudinal cohort 63 100% APS 21.9 (4.5), 14–30 47.6 SIPS/SOPS 6 4
Cotter et al. (2017) Australia Longitudinal cohort 268 70.5% APS, 11.2% BLIPS, 24.6% GRD 18.6 (2.3), 15–30 48.9 CAARMS 178.4 5
de Wit et al. (2014) Netherlands Longitudinal cohort 44 N.a. 14.9; 2.2, 12–18 47.1 SIPS/SOPS 72 4
Falkenberg et al. (2017) UK Longitudinal cohort 34 N.a. 22.0, 14–35 29.4 CAARMS 24 4
Guo et al. (2019) USA Longitudinal cohort 117 N.a. 16.6 (3.5), 12–25 42.7 SIPS/SOPS 12 4
Kline et al. (2016) USA Longitudinal cohort 21 N.a. 16.2 (3.1), 12–22 65.0 SIPS/SOPS 6 3
Landa et al. (2016) USA Longitudinal cohort 6 66.7% APS, 16.7% BLIPS, 16.7% GRD 19.5 (1.5), 16–21 66.7 CAARMS 6.7 3
Lemos-Giráldez et al. (2009) Spain Longitudinal cohort 61 85.2% APS, 4.9% BLIPS, 9.8% GRD 21.7 (3.8), 15–31 34.4 SIPS/SOPS 36 5
Lin et al. (2013) Australia Longitudinal cohort 325 79.7% APS, 13.5% BLIPS, 28.6% GRD 19.1 (3.3), 15–30 52.9 CAARMS 178.3b 5
Michel et al. (2018) Germany Longitudinal cohort 194 95.9% APS, 12.9% BLIPS, 1.0% GRD, 34.5% BS 25.3 (5.9), 16.6–39.7 37.0 SIPS/SOPS 55.9b 4
Mittal et al. (2010) USA Longitudinal cohort 90 N.a. 15.6 (3.0), 11–29 32.2 SIPS/SOPS 24 5
Mongan et al. (2020) Multi Longitudinal cohort 133 N.a. 22.6 (4.5) 49.0 CAARMS 24 6
Pelizza et al. (2019) Italy Longitudinal cohort 55 90.9% APS, 5.5% BLIPS. 30.9% GRD 18.4 (4.9), 13–35 49.2 CAARMS, PANSS 12 6
Phillips et al. (2007) Australia Randomised clinical trial 17 N.a. N.a., 14–30 N.a. BPRS, SANS 48 5
Rüsch et al. (2015) Switzerland Longitudinal cohort 172 N.a. 21.4 (5.8), 13–35 41.0 SIPS/SOPS 12 3
Rutigliano et al. (2016) UK Longitudinal cohort 154 83.8% APS, 16.2% BLIPS 23.4 (4.6), 14–35 39.6 CAARMS 120 4
Ryan et al. (2017) Australia Longitudinal cohort 180 83.3% APS, 2.8% BLIPS, 23.3% GRD 18.2 (2.7), 15–24 62.8 CAARMS 12 5
Sawada et al. (2017) Japan Longitudinal cohort 47 N.a. 19.9, 3.5, 12–30 52.9 SIPS/SOPS 54 5
Shi et al. (2016) China Longitudinal cohort 32 N.a. 18.8 (1.1) 59.4 SIPS/SOPS 6 5
Velthorst et al. (2011) Netherlands Longitudinal cohort 77 N.a. 19.2 (3.8), 12–35 33.8 SIPS/SOPS 36 5
Yee et al. (2018) Singapore Longitudinal cohort 211 N.a. 21.8 (3.6), 14–29 32.4 CAARMS 24 3
Zhang et al. (2017) China Longitudinal cohort 117 78.6% APS, 3.4% BLIPS, 23.1% GRD 24.7 (7.6), 15–45 52.1 SIPS/SOPS 28.3b 4
Ziermans et al. (2011) Netherlands Longitudinal cohort 72 N.a. 15.3 (1.9), 12–18 38.9 SIPS/SOPS 24 4

APS, Attenuated Psychosis Symptoms; BLIPS, Brief Limited Intermittent Psychotic Symptoms; BS, Basic symptoms; CAARMS, Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States; CHR-P, Clinical high risk of psychosis; GRD, Genetic risk and deterioration syndrome; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; SIPS, Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes.

a

Overlapping samples can contribute with different outcomes.

b

Mean duration of follow-up.