Table 3.
Model | Mean sq. | df | F | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Body condition (K; g mm−3 104) | ||||
Treatment | 0.019 | 1,57 | 4.070 | 0.048 |
Trial | 0.004 | 1,81 | 0.791 | 0.376 |
Sex | 0.031 | 1,66 | 6.465 | 0.013 |
Tank | 0.007 | 10,57 | 1.502 | 0.162 |
Body weight | 0.051 | 1,94 | 1.075 101 | 0.001 |
Treatment × trial | 0.001 | 1,67 | 0.268 | 0.607 |
Treatment × sex | 0.002 | 1,57 | 0.347 | 0.558 |
Trial × sex | 0.257 | 1,74 | 5.373 101 | <0.001 |
Treatment × trial × sex | 0.008 | 1.67 | 1.668 | 0.201 |
Body shape ♂ (RW2) | ||||
Treatment | 0.001 | 1,23 | 4.527 | 0.035 |
Trial | 0.002 | 1,38 | 1.446 101 | 0.003 |
Tank | 0.001 | 10,24 | 4.257 | 0.003 |
Body size | <0.001 | 1,36 | 0.006 | 0.593 |
Treatment × trial | 0.001 | 1,34 | 5.197 | 0.030 |
Body shape ♀ (RW2) | ||||
Treatment | 0.001 | 1,57 | 2.973 | 0.126 |
Trial | 0.004 | 1,57 | 1.858 101 | 0.004 |
Tank | <0.001 | 10,57 | 2.259 | 0.055 |
Body size | <0.001 | 1,57 | <0.001 | 0.838 |
Treatment × trial | <0.001 | 1,57 | 0.051 | 0.838 |
Sperm number ♂ (counts; 106) | ||||
Treatment | 4.880 101 | 1,12 | 5.653 | 0.035 |
Body size | 0.265 | 1,12 | 0.031 | 0.864 |
Tank | 0.588 | 1,12 | 0.068 | 0.799 |
Sperm velocity ♂ (μm s−1) | ||||
Treatment | 0.050 | 1,13 | <0.001 | 0.990 |
Body size | 6.924 101 | 1,13 | 0.244 | 0.630 |
Tank | 2.903 103 | 1,13 | 1.022 101 | 0.007 |
Egg number ♀ (counts) | ||||
Treatment | 1.816 101 | 1,7 | 5.456 | 0.052 |
Body size | 6.044 101 | 1,7 | 1.816 101 | 0.004 |
Tank | 6.738 | 7,7 | 2.024 | 0.186 |
Egg weight ♀ (mg) | ||||
Treatment | 6.738 101 | 1,21 | 7.458 | 0.012 |
Body size | 2.190 102 | 1,21 | 2.424 101 | <0.001 |
Tank | 1.518 101 | 10,21 | 1.680 | 0.152 |
Treatment (non-exposed and robot-exposed), body size/weight, and mesocosm tank are included as fixed effects in each model. Models on body shape (Relative Warps score 2, RW2) also included trial and treatment × trial as covariates, because body shape was measured twice for each individual during the study—before and after exposure to the robot—and false discovery rate-adjusted p values are presented. Body condition was tested on males and females together, and the model also included sex and its interaction with treatment and trial. Random intercepts (individual ID) are included in body condition and shape models, and they are absent in models for sperm and eggs as fertility traits were measured once per individual, on sexually mature individuals only. Analysis of variance was performed with Satterthwaite's method. Significant results are in bold.