Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 24;12:1235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05360-2

Table 1.

Effect of M-CSF neutralization on blood cells.

Parameter, units Sham + isotype (n = 6) Burn + isotype (n = 6) Burn + anti-M-CSF (n = 6)
Neutrophils, K/µl 0.15 ± 0.03 0.68 ± 0.41* 1.23 ± 0.44#
Monocytes, K/µl 0.03 ± 0.03 0.05 ± 0.03 0.03 ± 0.01
Lymphocytes, K/µl 1.03 ± 0.29 1.06 ± 0.54 1.21 ± 0.50
Platelets, K/µl 826 ± 181 1194 ± 116* 1307 ± 120
Red cells, M/µl 8.64 ± 0.30 8.18 ± 0.21* 8.58 ± 0.32#
Hemoglobin, g/dL 14.10 ± 0.44 12.93 ± 0.12* 13.30 ± 0.42
Hematocrit, % 45.07 ± 1.30 42.22 ± 1.28* 42.95 ± 1.83
MCV, fL 52.17 ± 0.76 51.65 ± 1.24 50.08 ± 0.47#
Reticulocytes, K/µl 281 ± 22 318 ± 33 334 ± 65
IRF-M + H, % 58.0 ± 2.4 69.5 ± 2.8* 66.2 ± 3.7
Low CH retic, % 28.2 ± 3.2 31.5 ± 10.3 46.7 ± 5.7#
Hypo retic, % 9.9 ± 4.7 21.8 ± 9.6* 28.4 ± 3.8

Parameters determined on an automated hematology system are presented as mean ± SD.

Significance, ANOVA p < 0.05 is indicated by * for burn isotype versus sham isotype and #for burn anti-M-CSF versus burn isotype.