TABLE 2.
Types of transmucosal delivery system | Advantages | Limitations | Challenges | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oral transmucosal vaccine delivery systems | Easy and self-administration Several dosage forms options Bypass first pass metabolism Fast onset of action from mucosal site Provides protection to the vaccine from acidic environment in gut and digestive enzymes High target specificity Controlled release of vaccine Rapid absorption because of increase blood supply Increased patient compliance Excellent accessibility |
Small surface area for absorption Dissolution problem in patients with dry mouth Unpalatable May not be suitable for vomiting and unconsciousness patients Rapid clearance of administered vaccine by saliva Vaccines should pass from the mucosal barrier to reach site of action Inconvenient for some patients Irritation of oral mucosa Small dose limit |
Protecting biological drugs such as peptides and proteins from enzymatic degradation Developing drugs or delivery systems that overcome the permeability barrier Polymeric vaccine delivery by parentral route is invasive and painful Limited efficient drug delivery systems |
Sankar et al. (2011) and Cho et al. (2021) |
Intranasal vaccine delivery systems | Highly vascularised mucosa Easy accessibility Needle free vaccination site Faster onset of immune response Induction of cross-reactive antibodies Reduction in the number of vaccinations required Lower cost Nanopowder has increased stability and ability to target further into the nasal cavity |
Variability in dosing Nasal obstruction/inflammation Special applicators are sometimes required for nanopowders limiting the ease and increasing the cost of administration |
High mucociliary clearance Narrow nasal passage Complex nasal geometry Negatively charged nanoparticles not compatible with mucosal delivery |
Yusuf and Kett (2017) |