Table 3.
Latent mean estimates and differences of the motivational constructs
| Identified Regulation | Social Support | Barrier Self-Efficacy | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est. | Δ | P-value | Est. | Δ | P-value | Est. | Δ | P-value | |
| Uganda | 4.689 | .000 | 2.482 | .000 | 4.065 | .000 | |||
| South Africa | 4.494 | −.194 | .000 | 1.978 | −.504 | .000 | 3.472 | −.593 | .000 |
| Sweden | 4.552 | −.136 | .025 | 2.159 | −.323 | .001 | 3.919 | −.147 | .009 |
| South Africa vs. Sweden | −.058 | .371 | −.180 | .048 | −.446 | .000 | |||
Legend: Scales of the estimates correspond to their indicators’ scales; i.e. 1–5 for identified regulation and barrier self-efficacy and 1–4 for social support. P-values were produced using the scaled chi-square difference test