Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 24;9(1):574–584. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13712

Table 3.

Distribution of patients according to indication for an ICD implantation as well as LVEF

ICD as a primary prevention ICD as a secondary prevention
LVEF ≤ 35% (n = 176) LVEF > 35% (n = 28) a Total group (n = 204) LVEF ≤ 35% (n = 12) LVEF > 35% (n = 26) Total group (n = 38)
Appropriate therapy 36 (20.4%) 6 (21.4%) 42 (20.5%) 2 (16.7%) 7 (26.9%) 9 (23.6%)
No therapy 140 (79.6%) 22 (78.6%) 162 (79.5%) 10 (84%) 19 (73.1%) 29 (26.4%)
a

All patients who had an ICD as a primary prevention and >35% in CMR had LVEF≤35% in echocardiography. The indication for an ICD implantation as a primary prevention was based on echocardiographic LVEF measurement in those patients.