Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 17;11:e69511. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69511

Table 1. Minimal inhibitory concentration of quinolones.

Strain* MIC (μg/ml)
NAL LVX OFX CIP
E. coli MG1656 3 S 0.023 S 0.006 S 0.004 S
E. coli MG1656/pDIJ09-518a >256 R 0.19 S 0.25 S 0.094 S
E. coli MG1656 + CIP 2 S 0.023 S 0.006 S 0.004 S
E. coli MG1656/pDIJ09-518a + CIP >256 R 0.25 S ×1.3 0.38 I x 1.5 0.19 S ×2
E. coli MG1656 + TOB 2 S 0.032 S 0.006 S 0.006 S
E. coli MG1656/pDIJ09-518a + TOB >256 R 0.38 S ×2 0.38 I x 1.5 0.25 S ×2.7
*

+CIP and +TOB stand for strains exposed to sub-MIC of ciprofloxacin and tobramycin, respectively, prior to MIC assessment.

Susceptibility testing categories according to EUCAST clinical breakpoints. Nalidixic acid: R > 16 μg/ml. Levofloxacin: S ≤ 0.5 μg/m, R > 1 μg/ml. Ofloxacin: S ≤ 0.25 μg/ml, R > 0.5 μg/ml. Ciprofloxacin: S ≤ 0.25 μg/ml, R > 0.5 μg/ml. Fold-change increases of MIC are shown in comparison to the QnrD-producing WT strain.

Similarly, the MICs increased for the qnrD-carrying E. coli exposed to sub-MIC of tobramycin as compared to growth in antibiotic-free medium (Table 1): 2-, 1.5-, and 2.7-fold higher for levofloxacin, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively. These results showed that the aminoglycoside-induced SOS response increased quinolone (nalidixic acid and fluoroquinolones) MIC in line with the increased expression of qnrD in E. coli.