Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 11;11:802205. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.802205

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of the HCR, CM, TLRS, and TLRN in the training and validation sets.

Model AUC(95% CI) Sensitive Specificity Accuracy PPV NPV
Training cohort CM 0.894
(0.827–0.960)
0.850 0.800 0.836 0.919 0.667
TLRS 0.986
(0.942–0.999)
0.975 0.967 0.973 0.987 0.936
TLRN 0.989
(0.947–1.000)
0.975 0.967 0.973 0.987 0.936
Internal validation cohort CM 0.820
(0.718–0.921)
0.720 0.796 0.770 0.936 0.667
TLRS 0.904
(0.814–0.961)
0.980 0.720 0.892 0.872 0.947
TLRN 0.958
(0.883–0.991)
0.857 0.960 0.891 0.976 0.774
External validation cohort 1 CM 0.816
(0.736–0.880)
0.827 0.687 0.772 0.805 0.717
TLRS 0.834
(0.756–0.895)
0.986 0.729 0.886 0.850 0.972
TLRN 0.867
(0.794–0.922)
0.987 0.729 0.886 0.851 0.972
External validation cohort 2 CM 0.866
(0.795–0.919)
0.926 0.640 0.817 0.807 0.842
TLRS 0.894 (0.828–0.941) 0.852 0.900 0.872 0.932 0.790
TLRN 0.921 (0.860–0.961) 0.926 0.820 0.886 0.893 0.872

AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval; CM, clinical model; TLRS, transfer learning radiomics signature; TLRN, transfer learning radiomics nomogram.