Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 12;8:801147. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.801147

Table 1.

Characteristics of the subjects according to MPS type.

Overall (n = 76) MPS I (n = 27) MPS II (n = 22) MPS IVA (n = 19) MPS VI (n = 8) p-value
Sex (n) M: 46
F: 30
M: 12
F: 15
M: 22
F: 0
M: 8
F: 11
M: 4
F: 4
<0.001†
Age (years) 11.3 (12.7) 10.2 (20.4) 11.8 (15.5) 10.1 (8.5) 16.2 (8.3) 0.491
Number of adults (n) 23/76 (30%) 8/27 (29%) 5/22 (23%) 7/19 (37%) 3/8 (38%) 0.757
Weight (kg) 25.6 (21.0) 23.5 (23.4) 28.0 (36.5) 21.0 (16.6) 22.3 (14.9) 0.103
Height (cm) 111.0 (35.0) 108.0 (8.4) 129.0 (36.0) 99.5 (19.7) 106.5 (18.4) 0.003‡
BSA (m2) 0.9 (0.5) 0.9 (0.6) 1.0 (0.7) 0.8 (0.3) 0.8 (0.4) 0.057
Treated with ERT (n) 47/76 16/27* 15/22 8/19 8/8 0.029§
Age at the start of ERT (years) 8.3 (10.1) 4.0 (15.4) 6.6 (8.9) 8.3 (8.1) 9.7 (2.3) 0.538
Time on ERT (months) 41.0 (77.0) 52.0 (79.5) 64.0 (76.0) 22.5 (22.3) 73.5 (79.0) 0.317

Continuous variables are reported as median and interquartile range.

*

Four patients who received ERT as a concomitant therapy for HSCT are not included in the ERT-treated group. Statistical analysis with chi-squared and partitioning for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc test for continuous variables.

†

MPS II is different from other MPS types.

‡

MPS IVA is different from MPS II.

§

MPS IVA is different from MPS VI.