Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 26;289(1967):20212314. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2314

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Comparing polygenic signals of SA polymorphism on the X chromosome and autosomes. (a) Distribution of the ratio of mean F^ST (F^STX¯/F^STA¯) based on 1000 bootstrap replicates for each of our three classes of data: simulated data from the theoretical null distribution (top), permuted data (middle) and observed data (bottom), illustrating the elevation in X-linked relative to autosomal F^ST (i.e. F^STX¯/F^STA¯1), even in the absence of SA polymorphism (i.e. in simulated and permuted data). (b) Distribution of the ratio of estimated X-linked to autosomal inflation in F^ST (fXsel and fAsel), across 1000 bootstrap replicates. The top panel uses observed and simulated data to estimate fXsel and fAsel, while the bottom panel uses observed and permuted data to estimate fXsel and fAsel. The dashed vertical line shows the theoretically predicted 9/4 X-to-autosome ratio when randomly distributed balanced SA polymorphisms account for the inflations of FST on each chromosome type. In both panels, we used a set of LD-pruned sites, rather than the full data, to avoid biases arising from differences in the extent of hitchhiking between autosomes and the X (see Methods). (Online version in colour.)