TABLE 4.
Mediating effect of work engagement.
| Individual creativity |
||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | ||
| Intercept | 2.333[1.837, 2.830] | 2.105[1.657, 2.553] | 1.495[1.071, 1.918] | 1.315[0.908, 1.722] | 1.422[1.018, 1.826] | |
| Gender | -0.164[-0.272, -0.056] | -0.148[-0.256, -0.039] | -0.155[-0.265, -0.045] | -0.158[-0.265, -0.051] | -0.163[-0.272, -0.055] | |
| Age | -0.012[-0.093, 0.069] | -0.018[-.100, 0.063] | -0.022[-0.105, 0.060] | -0.021[-0.102, 0.059] | -0.021[-0.102, 0.061] | |
| Education level | 0.103[0.030, 0.175] | 0.094[0.021, 0.168] | 0.112[0.038, 0.187] | 0.128[0.055, 0.201] | 0.114[0.041, 0.187] | |
| Direct effect | Morality, β1 | 0.211[0.109, 0.312] | ||||
| Talent, β2 | 0.165[0.076, 0.255] | |||||
| Morality2, β3 | 0.047[0.000, 0.094] | |||||
| Morality × Talent, β4 | 0.130[0.074, 0.186] | |||||
| Talent2, β5 | 0.094[0.043, 0.146] | |||||
| Work engagement | 0.426[0.319, 0.533] | 0.484[0.393, 0.576] | 0.627[0.553, 0.702] | 0.660[0.588, 0.732] | 0.641[0.569, 0.712] | |
| Indirect effect | 0.314[0.233, 0.409] | 0.319[0.235, 0.414] | -.156[-.202, -.089] | -0.191[-0.256, -0.088] | -.148[-0.232, -0.079] | |
| R-sq | 0.469*** | 0.464*** | 0.451*** | 0.474*** | 0.464*** | |
| F | 65.720 | 64.497 | 61.092 | 67.141 | 64.375 | |
*** indicates significance at the level of p < 0.001.