Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 11;10(3):1246–1255. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07210

Table 1. EcoScale Analysis of the Proposed 2-GG Processa.

parameter description penalty points
1. Yield 2-GG yield (83%) of the reaction was taken 9
2. Price of reaction components (to obtain 10 mmol of the end product) ∼10 t product with a 2-GG content of 50 wt % is produced annually → 19.7 kmol 2-GG a–1 total raw material costs are 566,825 € a–1 0
3. Safety Hazard compounds:  
    Organic phase of the extraction processb 15
    1-Octanol  
    n-Heptane (F, N)c  
    Napthalene-2-boronic acid  
    Aliquat 336 (N, T)c  
    Stripping phase of the stripping process 5
    HNO3 (T)c  
4. Technical setupd Pressure equipment 3
    Packed-bed reactor  
    Instruments for controlled addition of chemicals 1
    Pump (constant flow rate)  
5. Temperature/time Reaction temperature 40 °C (>1 h) 3
6. Workup and purification Dilution (adding solvent) 0
    Extraction-stripping (liquid–liquid extraction) 3
    Ultrafiltration (filtration) 1
    Borate removal (solid phase extraction) 2
    Diafiltration (filtration) 1
    Permeate evaporation (removal of solvent with bp < 150 °C) 0
    Retentate evaporation (removal of solvent with bp < 150 °C) 0
    Ultrafiltration (filtration) 1
Totale     44
a

A detailed description of the EcoScale can be found in Van Aken et al. (2006).23

b

It was assumed that the organic phase is one entity. If two compounds shared the same hazard warning symbol, it was only counted as one.

c

F, highly flammable; N, dangerous to the environment; and T, toxic.

d

Technical setup of the biosynthesis is considered.

e

Ranking: <25 excellent, <50 acceptable, and >50 inadequate.