Table 1.
No | Statement | Agreement | Likert scale | Consensus |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Enzymatic debridement is one of the early eschar removal methods for burns | 100% | 5/5 strongly agree | Yes |
2 | Nexobrid®-based enzymatic debridement is a safe tool as long as is it used by an experienced burn team | 100% | 4/5 strongly agree 1/5 agree |
Yes |
3 | Enzymatic debridement is not recommended for use in chemical or electrical burns | 100% | 3/5 strongly agree 1/5 agree 1/5 somewhat agree |
Yes |
4 | Enzymatic debridement is particularly beneficial in treating burns of the upper limbs, including the arms, as well as the face and the groin | 100% | 4/5 strongly agree 1/5 agree |
Yes |
5 | Enzymatic debridement can be used in extensive burns but needs to be restricted to 15% of the body surface area per session | 100% | 4/5 strongly agree 1/5 agree |
Yes |
6 | Given the selective nature of enzymatic debridement, it is recommended for use particularly in treatment of mixed deep dermal and full-thickness burns | 100% | 5/5 strongly agree | Yes |
7 | Using enzymatic debridement as a means of early removal of eschar in circumferential burns allows avoidance of surgical escharotomy | 100% | 4/5 strongly agree 1/5 agree |
Yes |
8 | Enzymatic debridement can be particularly useful in cases of limited access to hospital resources, such as in mass disasters | 80% | 4/5 strongly agree 1/5 disagree |
No |