Table 1.
Unanswered questions and future considerations relevant to DHTRs
Unanswered questions | Future considerations |
---|---|
Are there particular characteristics of antigen/antibody binding in and of themselves that determine whether a severe DHTR will occur? | • IgG subtype studies • IgG glycosylation studies • Antigen density studies • Contribution of IgM • Are there blood donor–specific considerations beyond RBC antigen expression? |
Are there inherent differences affecting the complement cascade in patients with recurrent DHTRs with bystander hemolysis? | • In-depth studies of patients with recurrent DHTRs • Measurement of complement breakdown products, including factor Bb • Consideration of genetic testing |
How can we determine the optimal treatment of DHTRs with hyperhemolysis? | • Could a multicenter clinical trial of anticomplement treatment (or other immunomodulatory therapy) be feasible? • Might other complement inhibitors beyond those targeting C5 be feasible in the setting of DHTR? |
What is the pathophysiology of antibody-negative DHTRs with hyperhemolysis? | • Develop a registry of patients with antibody-negative DHTRs for translational immunologic and genetic studies |
How do we prevent future DHTRs in patients with a history of severe DHTRs (especially antibody-negative DHTRs) who need RBC transfusion? | • Prospective multicenter studies of patients with recurrent DHTRs • Preclinical and translational studies are needed for a better mechanistic understanding |
How can we work together in the United States to create an RBC antibody registry? | • Consideration of an accrediting agency making this mandatory as a patient safety initiative • Consideration of collaborating with blood bank information software companies, with participation in an antibody registry being a benefit to hospital clients and an incentive for future clients |
IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M.