Skip to main content
Blood Advances logoLink to Blood Advances
. 2022 Jan 19;6(2):528–532. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005738

Genetic features and clinical outcomes of patients with isolated and comutated DDX41-mutated myeloid neoplasms

Hassan B Alkhateeb 1,*,, Ahmad Nanaa 1,*, David Viswanatha 2, James M Foran 3, Talha Badar 3, Lisa Sproat 4, Rong He 2, Phuong Nguyen 2, Dragan Jevremovic 2, Mohamad E Salama 2, Patricia Greipp 5, Naseema Gangat 1, Ayalew Tefferi 1, Mark R Litzow 1, Abhishek A Mangaonkar 1, Mithun Vinod Shah 1, Mrinal Patnaik 1, Aref Al-Kali 1
PMCID: PMC8791578  PMID: 34644397

Key Points

  • Isolated and comutated DDX41 myeloid neoplasms have different characteristics.

  • DDX41-mutated AML has a relatively favorable outcome comparable to core binding factor AML.

Visual Abstract

graphic file with name advancesADV2021005738absf1.jpg

Abstract

DDX41 mutations (germline and somatic) are associated with late onset myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML). Myeloid neoplasms (MN) with germline predisposition was identified as a distinct category in the 2016 WHO classification revision, including MN with germline DDX41 mutation. We retrospectively analyzed the molecular findings and clinical characteristics of thirty-three DDX41-mutated (mDDX41) patients at our institution. We identified 14 distinct pathogenic DDX41 variants in 32 patients and 8 DDX41 variants of unknown significance (VUS) in 9 patients. Five (16%) patients had a second DDX41 somatic mutation p.R525H and 13 (40%) had at least one additional oncogenic co-mutation in other genes. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 66 years, with male predominance (72%) and the majority of patients had normal cytogenetics (91%). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 86% and 6 (21%) MDS/AML patients with relatively preserved hematopoietic function were observed without further intervention. In comparison to AML patients with prognostically more favorable subtypes [t(8;21), n=27 and inv(16), n=40], mDDX41 patients in our cohort showed similarly favorable OS. Our study highlights that mDDX41-MN patients often have an indolent course and mDDX41-AML has comparable OS to favorable-risk AML.

Introduction

The DEAD-box helicase 41 (DDX41) gene, located on chromosome 5q35, is presumed to be a tumor suppressor gene, encoding a DEAD-box type RNA helicase. DDX41 is involved in pre-mRNA splicing, rRNA processing and innate immunity.1-3 Unlike other germline predisposition syndromes, which typically present at an earlier age, DDX41-associated germline cases are characterized by late-onset development of myeloid neoplasms (MNs), and may occur as sporadic germline events.1,2,4-12 DDX41 mutations account for 0.5% to 5% of adult myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and typically present as high-risk disease, with male predominance and variable history of preceding cytopenias.1,2,13-16 Recent studies have reported that DDX41-related MN is associated with longer overall survival (OS) and response to lenalidomide.10,14,17,18 In this study, we describe the clinical and genetic features and survival outcomes of patients with mutated DDX41.

Methods

This is a single-institution study encompassing the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center sites (Rochester, Florida, and Arizona). After institutional review board approval, we retrospectively screened for mDDX41 cases from 4524 consecutive Mayo Clinic patient samples submitted for a 42-gene MN panel next-generation sequencing clinical assay in the Molecular Hematopathology Laboratory between July 2018 and December 2020. A chart review of mDDX41 cases between January 2009 and April 2021 was conducted. Of 1404 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of AML, 27 (1.9%) patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1); RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and 40 (2.8%) with inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB-MYH11 were identified for survival comparison with mDDX41 AML. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 14.1.0 Software (supplemental Methods).

Results and discussion

We identified 33 patients harboring DDX41 genetic alterations, of which 32 (97%) had at least 1 pathogenic DDX41 mutation and 1 (3%) had a DDX41 variant of uncertain significance (VUS) (proven to be a germline variant). Of the 32 patients harboring pathogenic mutations, 5 (16%) had a second DDX41 mutation (p.R525H), and 9 (27%) harbored a DDX41 VUS (Figure 1; supplemental Table 1). The germline origin of DDX41 variants was confirmed in 9 of 10 (90%) tested patients, among them at least 1 variant had variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥ 40%.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Characteristics of patients with DDX41 mutation. (A) Representation of DDX41 variants detected, positioned on the DDX41 protein and its functional domains. (B) Patterns of the mutations identified in the cohort of 33 patients with DDX41 mutation. The number reported in the box represents the VAF of each mutation. (C-D) Kaplan-Meier survival curves in 10 patients with mDDX41 AML compared with (C) 40 patients with inv 16 AML and (D) 27 patient with t(8;21) AML. CTD, C-terminal domain; ZFD, zinc finger domain; Δ, second mutation.

The median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range, 30-81 years), and 24 (72%) patients were men, consistent with late onset of mDDX41 MN and male predominance previously reported.8,14-16,19 All patients with AML were intermediate risk for the European LeukemiaNet (ELN), with a median marrow blast count of 29% (range, 20%-50%). The majority of MDSs were classified as excess blasts-2 (MDS-EB2; N = 13; 68%), similar to that previously reported in the literature.15,16,19 Eleven (58%) and 4 (21%) patients with MDS were classified as intermediate risk and high risk by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), respectively.

Twenty (60%) patients had an isolated DDX41 mutation, whereas 13 (40%) had at least 1 additional comutation in other genes. Isolated mDDX41 cases showed male predominance relative to their comutated counterparts (85% vs 54%; P = .05; Table 1). The median number of comutations in the 13 cases was 1 (range,1-3), and the most common comutations occurred in DNMT3A (N = 5, 38%), ASXL1 (N = 4, 30%), JAK2 (N = 3, 23%), and EZH2 (N = 2, 15%; Figure 1; supplemental Tables 1 and 2). The incidence of TP53 mutation was infrequent (3%), comparable to what was reported by Sébert et al15 (6%) but lower than that reported by Quesada et al16 (32%). Similarly, we observed a low incidence of splicing factor comutations (3%), in keeping with the report from Sébert et al.10,16 Our cohort had fewer comutations (median of 0; range, 0-3) than what reported by recent studies, and interestingly, the comutation median VAF observed here was low 7% (range, 5%-52%).15,16

Table 1.

Characteristics and hematologic features of patients with isolated and comutated DDX41 mutation

Variable Isolated Comutated P
No. of patients, (%) 20 (60) 13 (40)
Age, y, median (range), at diagnosis 65 (30-81) 66 (50-76) .767
Sex (male), n (%) 17 (85) 7 (54) .0496*
Hemoglobin, g/dL, median (range) 11.2 (7.5-15.6) 10.05 (6.6-14) .1988
Leukocytes, 109/L, median (range) 2.15 (1-4.4) 2.4 (1.6-8.5) .1239
Thrombocytes, 109/L, median (range) 87 (28-241) 94 (63-571) .1443
ANC, median (range) 0.925 (0.16-3.73) 1.005 (0.65-4.78) .2058
MCV median (range) 104.3 (85.2-114.8) 105.6 (90-115) .7151
RDW, median (range) 14.2 (12.4-23.4) 15.05 (12.5-21.3) .2824
BM blasts, median (range) 13 (1-45) 12 (0-50) .6056
BM blasts (AML only), median (range) 34 (20-45) 25.5 (21-50) .91
Number of comutations, median (range) 0 1 (1-3)
DDX41 VAF % 48 (7-52) 45 (5-51) .1656
DDX41 mutations > 1 2 (10) 3 (23) .306
Pathogenic mutation type
 Missense 5 (26) 3 (23) .8354
 Nonsense 1 (5) 2 (15) .3347
 Frameshift 4 (21) 5 (38) .2820
 Splice site mutation 0 2 (15) .0774
 Start-loss variant 9 (47) 1 (7) .0174*
Diagnosis
 MDS 13 (65) 6 (46) .2845
 AML 6 (30) 4 (30) .96
 MPN 0 2 (15)
 Carrier 1 (5) 0
 CCUS 0 1 (7)
Abnormal cytogenetics 0 3 (25) .0188*
Family history
 Solid or hematologic malignancies 11 (61) 12 (92) .0501
 Solid tumors 6 (33) 10 (77) .0166*
 Hematologic malignancies 8 (44) 4 (30) .4405
 Gastrointestinal malignancies 3 (15) 3 (23) .6040
 Genitourinary malignancies 2 (10) 4 (30) .1496
 Lung cancer 1 (5) 3 (23) .1345
 Breast cancer 2 (10) 2 (15) .6832
Any personal history
 Hematologic malignancies 0 1 (7) .2078
 Solid tumors 1 (5) 3 (23) .1200
DDX41 VUS
 Yes 5 (25) 4 (30) .7161
 No 15 (75) 9 (70)

ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BM, bone marrow; CCUS, clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasms; RDW, red cell distribution width.

*

Statistically significant.

The most common pathogenic mutation type was the initiation codon substitution (start-loss) variant p.M1I (N = 10, 31%; Table 1; supplemental Table 1), previously described as the second most common germline DDX41 variant in Whites and the most common in Swedish population.8,14,15 Among isolated cases, 47% had p.M1I, whereas only 8% of comutated cases harbored p.M1I (P = .02). Twenty-one (65.6%) DDX41 mutations clustered in the N-terminal domain (NTD), 4 (12.5%) in the DEAD-box domain, and 7 (22%) in the helicase-C domain (HCD). Mutations located in the HCD were more likely to have a concomitant DDX41 VUS compared with NTD mutations (N = 6, 86% vs N = 2, 10%; P = .0001).

Sixteen patients (52%) had a family history (FH) of solid tumors and 12 (39%) had a FH of hematologic malignancies. Comutated cases were more likely to have FH of solid tumors (77% vs 33%; P = .02; Table 1).20 However, this difference was not significant for hematologic or subgroups of solid malignancies. None of the HCD-mutated cases had FH of solid tumors, in comparison with 70% seen in NTD-mutated cases (P = .001), supporting the reported prevalence of germline mutations in the NTD.8

Cytogenetic results were available in 32 cases, and 29 (91%) showed a normal karyotype. Karyotypic abnormalities were thus infrequent (N = 3, 9%), consistent with previous reports.15,16,19 Interestingly, all 3 cases with karyotypic abnormalities were comutated cases (P = .02).

Overall, 2 (7%) patients died after a median follow-up of 20 months. Six (20%) patients (5 MDS and 1 AML) were observed because of stable blood indices with a median follow-up of 6.6 months (range, 1.5-32.6 months). Twenty-three (80%) patients received treatment with median time from diagnosis to treatment initiation of 0.7 months (range, 0-92 months). Overall response rate in patients with MDS/AML was 77%, and median time to response was 3.2 months (range, 0.9-20.5 months; supplemental Table 3). Fifteen (68%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), 2 (9%) patients had hematologic improvement, and 3 (23%) patients did not respond. Patients with AML had 100% CR when treated with induction chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents (HMA) plus venetoclax regimen, and median time to CR was 1 month (range, 0.86-4.1 months). Of the 9 (39%) patients who received second-line therapy, 6 (75%) achieved CR. Four (21%) of 19 patients with MDS progressed into AML with a median time to progression of 16 months (range, 1.3-27.6 months), and the 2-year progression-free survival rate for patients with MDS was 62%.

In mDDX41 MDS/AML, the median OS was not reached, and the 2-year OS was 86% (95% confidence interval: 57%-97%). There was no statistically significant difference in OS between 2-year OS for isolated and comutated (P = .99) responders and nonresponders (90% vs 50%; P = .38) and treatment compared with the 2-year OS for the observation group (83% vs 100%; P = .52; supplemental Figure 1). Twelve (41%) patients with MDS/AML received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and there was no difference in 2-year OS between patients who received HSCT vs no HSCT (87% vs 86%; P = 1.0; supplemental Figure 1).

All patients with mDDX41 AML were alive at the end of follow-up without reaching median OS. Comparing the OS of mDDX41 AML to the prognostically favorable group of core-binding factor AML, a statistically significant superior outcome was observed in mDDX41-AML compared with AML with t(8;21) (2-year OS, 100% vs 51%; P = .024; Figure 1D). In comparison with AML with inv(16), mDDX41 AML showed a trend to better OS; however, statistical significance was not achieved (2-year OS, 100% vs 84%; P = .2), supporting at least noninferior clinical outcome (Figure 1C).

Our study reaffirms some previous observations and demonstrates several novel findings in patients with MN and mDDX41. Isolated DDX41 mutations were associated with male predominance (85%), the start-loss p.M1I mutation (47%), normal cytogenetics (100%), and less frequent association with a FH of solid tumors (33%) compared with their comutated counterpart. Patients with mDDX41 MN have a low incidence of TP53 and splicing factor gene comutations. Despite the categorization of all patients with mDDX41 AML intermediate risk for ELN, we found they fit favorable-risk AML in our study cohort.21-23 Finally, some mDDX41 MN cases can be observed for a long time if they have preserved hematopoiesis, and therapeutic intervention could be delayed. We acknowledge that our study is limited by the retrospective nature and small sample size.

Supplementary Material

The full-text version of this article contains a data supplement.

Authorship

Contribution: A.N., A.A.-K., H.B.A., and D.V. designed the study, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript; A.N. collected the data and conducted the statistical analysis; M.V.S., J.M.F., T.B., A.T., M.R.L., M.M.P., N.G, A.A.M., L.S., H.B.A., and A.A.-K., cared for the patients and provided patient information; R.H., P.N., D.J., and D.V. performed the next-generation sequencing; P.G. performed cytogenetic analysis; and all authors critically reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Hassan Alkhateeb, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester MN 55905; e-mail: alkhateeb.hassan@mayo.edu.

References

  • 1.Cheah JJC, Hahn CN, Hiwase DK, Scott HS, Brown AL. Myeloid neoplasms with germline DDX41 mutation. Int J Hematol. 2017;106(2):163-174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Maciejewski JP, Padgett RA, Brown AL, Müller-Tidow C. DDX41-related myeloid neoplasia. Semin Hematol. 2017;54(2):94-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang Z, Yuan B, Bao M, Lu N, Kim T, Liu Y-J. The helicase DDX41 senses intracellular DNA mediated by the adaptor STING in dendritic cells [correction published in Nat Immunol. 2012;13:196]. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(10):959-965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bluteau O, Sebert M, Leblanc T, et al. A landscape of germ line mutations in a cohort of inherited bone marrow failure patients. Blood. 2018;131(7):717-732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Collin M, Dickinson R, Bigley V. Haematopoietic and immune defects associated with GATA2 mutation. Br J Haematol. 2015;169(2):173-187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Drazer MW, Kadri S, Sukhanova M, et al. Prognostic tumor sequencing panels frequently identify germ line variants associated with hereditary hematopoietic malignancies. Blood Adv. 2018;2(2):146-150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hahn CN, Chong C-E, Carmichael CL, et al. Heritable GATA2 mutations associated with familial myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):1012-1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lewinsohn M, Brown AL, Weinel LM, et al. Novel germ line DDX41 mutations define families with a lower age of MDS/AML onset and lymphoid malignancies. Blood. 2016;127(8):1017-1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Owen C, Barnett M, Fitzgibbon J. Familial myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukaemia: a review. Br J Haematol. 2008;140(2):123-132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Polprasert C, Schulze I, Sekeres MA, et al. Inherited and somatic defects in DDX41 in myeloid neoplasms. Cancer Cell. 2015;27(5):658-670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tawana K, Drazer MW, Churpek JE. Universal genetic testing for inherited susceptibility in children and adults with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia: are we there yet? Leukemia. 2018;32(7):1482-1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang MY, Churpek JE, Keel SB, et al. Germline ETV6 mutations in familial thrombocytopenia and hematologic malignancy. Nat Genet. 2015;47(2):180-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Akpan IJ, Osman AEG, Drazer MW, Godley LA. Hereditary myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia: diagnosis, questions, and controversies. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018;13(6):426-434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Makishima H, Nannya Y, Takeda J, et al. Clinical impacts of germline DDX41 mutations on myeloid neoplasms. Blood. 2020;136(suppl 1):38-40. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Quesada AE, Routbort MJ, DiNardo CD, et al. DDX41 mutations in myeloid neoplasms are associated with male gender, TP53 mutations and high-risk disease. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(7):757-766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sébert M, Passet M, Raimbault A, et al. Germline DDX41 mutations define a significant entity within adult MDS/AML patients. Blood. 2019;134(17):1441-1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Abou Dalle I, Kantarjian H, Bannon SA, et al. Successful lenalidomide treatment in high risk myelodysplastic syndrome with germline DDX41 mutation. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(2):227-229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Negoro E, Radivoyevitch T, Polprasert C, et al. Molecular predictors of response in patients with myeloid neoplasms treated with lenalidomide. Leukemia. 2016;30(12):2405-2409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Qu S, Li B, Qin T, et al. Molecular and clinical features of myeloid neoplasms with somatic DDX41 mutations. Br J Haematol. 2021;192(6):1006-1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bannon SA, Routbort MJ, Montalban-Bravo G, et al. Next-generation sequencing of DDX41 in myeloid neoplasms leads to increased detection of germline alterations. Front Oncol. 2021;10:582213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Byrd JC, Dodge RK, Carroll A, et al. Patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) and acute myeloid leukemia have superior failure-free and overall survival when repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine are administered. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(12):3767-3775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Delaunay J, Vey N, Leblanc T, et al. ; Bordeaux-Grenoble-Marseille-Toulouse Cooperative Groups . Prognosis of inv(16)/t(16;16) acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a survey of 110 cases from the French AML Intergroup. Blood. 2003;102(2):462-469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129(4):424-447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Blood Advances are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Hematology

RESOURCES