Table 2.
CON |
DAM |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre | During | Pre | During | |
Energy, MJ | 11.0 ± 0.6 | 11.3 ± 3.0 | 12.0 ± 1.0 | 9.6 ± 1.1 |
Energy, Kcal | 2,618 ± 153 | 2,689 ± 171 | 2,862 ± 237 | 2,283 ± 252 |
Protein, g·day−1 | 120 ± 6 | 111 ± 7 | 119 ± 13 | 98 ± 14 |
Protein, g·kgBM·day−1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 |
Protein, %En | 19 ± 1 | 17 ± 1 | 17 ± 1 | 18 ± 1 |
Carbohydrate, g·day−1 | 293 ± 23 | 311 ± 24 | 288 ± 29 | 254 ± 26 |
Carbohydrate, %En | 45 ± 2 | 46 ± 2 | 41 ± 3 | 45 ± 3 |
Fat, g·day−1 | 103 ± 8 | 108 ± 8 | 123 ± 12 | 97 ± 11 |
Fat, %En | 35 ± 2 | 36 ± 2 | 38 ± 2 | 36 ± 2 |
Values are represented as means ± SE. CON participants performed no eccentric contractions (n = 11), whereas DAM (n = 10) participants performed 300 maximal eccentric muscle damaging knee extensor contractions in both legs immediately prior to the start of a 7-day unilateral leg immobilization period. “Pre” represents average 3-day dietary intake before immobilization; “During” represents average dietary intake during the first and last 2 days of immobilization. No significant differences were observed within or between groups (P > 0.05).