Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 27;55(6):4979–5062. doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10124-x

Table 11.

Theoretical challenges of MCDM

Studies Layer Challenges of MCDM theory
Weight theories Ranking theories Ambiguous and vagueness
Subjects + Hybrid Objectives Normalisation Aggregation External criteria weighting Reverse ranking
Unnatural comparison Inconsistency Time consumption in a pairwise comparison Global weight (aggregating the weights) Dynamic change
Pamučar et al. (2020) Evaluation
Samanıloğlu and Kaya (2020)
Ocampo and Yamagishi (2020)
Sarwar and Imran (2021)
Wu and Xu (2020)
Yang et al. (2020)
Mahanta and Panda (2020)
Sayan et al. (2020)
Mohammed et al. (2020)
Abdel-Basst et al. (2020b)
Albahri et al. (2020)
Garg et al. (2020)
Yang et al. (2021)
Shirazi et al. (2020)
Naeem et al. (2020)
Ortiz–Barrios et al. (2020)
Wan et al. (2021)
Manupati et al. (2021)
Zhang et al. (2020)
Bharsakade et al. (2021)
Mishra et al. (2019)
Baz et al. (2020)
Ashraf and Abdullah (2020)
Jain et al. (2021)
Ghorui (2021)
Grida et al. (2020)
Jamshidiantehrani et al. (2020)
Sharma et al. (2020)
Khurana et al. (2020)
Ghosh et al. (2020)
Moslem et al. (2020)
Shah et al. (2020)
Lam et al. (2021)
Duan et al. (2021)
Yao (2021)
Altuntas and Gok (2021)
Ecer and Pamucar (2021)
Althaf and Babbitt (2021)
Chauhan et al. (2020)
Mardani et al. (2020)
Gong et al. (2021)
Requia et al. (2019) Development
Ashraf et al. (2020)
Ahmad et al. (2021)
Nardo et al. (2020)
Abdulsalam and Hossain (2020)
Albahri et al. (2020)
Albahri and Hamid (2020)
Albahri (2020)
Alsalem et al. (2021)
Mohammed (2021)
Hezam et al. (2020)
Zidan (2021)
Zaidan (2021a)
Zaidan (2021b)
Percentages % 1.81 7.27 7.27 1.81 1.81 1.81 12.72 1.81 3.63 69.09

(✓) = Including

(–) = Not including