Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 27;55(6):4979–5062. doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10124-x

Table 8.

MCDM contexts

Studies Method Individual Group
Internal External
Evaluation
Pamučar et al. (2020) Fuzzy RAFSI
Samanıloğlu and Kaya (2020), Bharsakade et al. (2021), Baz et al. (2020), Khurana et al. (2020), Ghosh et al. (2020) F–AHP
Ocampo and Yamagishi (2020), Altuntas and Gok (2021), Chauhan et al. (2020) DEMATEL
Sarwar and Imran (2021) AHP
Wu and Xu (2020) TODIM
Yang et al. (2020) SpNoFWBM
Mahanta and Panda (2020) New distance measure for IFSs
Sayan et al. (2020) PROMETHEE-TOPSIS
Mohammed et al. (2020), Abdel-Basst et al. (2020b), Ortiz-Barrios et al. (2020), Grida et al. (2020) Althaf and Babbitt 2021) TOPSIS
Albahri et al. (2020), Wan et al. (2021), Jain et al. (2021) VIKOR
Garg et al. (2020) Fermatean fuzzy sets (FFNs)
Yang et al. (2021) CQROULWPBM
Shirazi et al. (2020) PROMETHEE
Naeem et al. (2020) PmF-TOPSIS
Manupati et al. (2021), Shah et al. (2020), Lam et al. (2021), Yao (2021) F-VIKOR
Zhang et al. (2020) MULTIMOORA
Mishra et al. (2019) HF-ARAS
Ashraf and Abdullah (2020) TOPSIS-GRA
Ghorui (2021) HFS-TOPSIS
Jamshidiantehrani et al. (2020)
Sharma et al. (2020) FLQOWA
Moslem et al. (2020)
Duan et al. (2021) IMEEM
Ecer and Pamucar (2021) MARCOS
Mardani et al. (2020) WASPAS
Gong et al. (2021) LHF-TODIM
Percentages % 2.38 78.57 2.38
Development
Requia et al. (2019), Hezam et al. (2020) AHP
Ashraf et al. (2020) COPRAS
Requia et al. (2021) Fuzzy assessment
Nardo et al. (2020) PAPRIKA
Abdulsalam and Hossain (2020), Albahri and Hamid (2020), Mohammed (2021) TOPSIS
Albahri et al. (2020), Alsalem et al. (2021) VIKOR
Albahri (2020) SODOSM
Zidan (2021) PFDOSM
Zaidan (2021a) T-SFDOSM
Zaidan (2021b) q-ROFDOSM
Percentages % 42.85 100 14.28

(✓) = Including

(–) = Not including