Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022 Jan 21;69(2):678–688. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3103201

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Comparison of foot progression angle computed by the IMU system and motion capture for one subject. The subject varied their foot progression angle with each step. The IMU system followed the same trends as the motion capture system but with smaller values across most steps. The average RMSE across all steps was 7.6 degrees.