Table 1.
Comparison of MS, NMR and SERS in metabolite detection. The descriptions of MS and NMR are according to reference [58].
| MS | NMR | SERS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | High and the limit of detection (LOD) reaches nM | Low but can be improved with high field intensity or low temperature | High and LOD reaches the range of nM - pM |
| Selectivity | Selective and non-selective analysis | Generally for non-selective analysis | Selective and non-selective analysis |
| Destruction | Destructive but a small number of samples required | Non-destructive and samples can be recycled after measurements | Non-destructive and a small number of samples required |
| Reproducibility | Moderate | High | Moderate, depending on substrate uniformity |
| Sample pretreatment | Demanding | Not necessary | Not necessary but recommended |
| Sample analysis time | Longer than NMR, and chromatography techniques required | Fast and the whole sample can be analyzed simultaneously | Fast and multiple analytes can be analyzed in one measurement |
| Targeted analysis | Relatively better | Not optimal | Not optimal |