Table 4.
Regression analysis summary results
| Model Number | Model independent variables^ | Breusch-Pagan test† | Model variables significantly associated with ln(SGI)¶ | F-test Adj R2 | AIC | LR‡ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (base) | sex, age, CTD diagnosis, OCD diagnosis, TTS, DOCS, ASRS-5 | χ2(1) = 1.36 p = 0.24 | OCD diagnosis: t = 2.7, p = 0.01 DOCS: t = 3.6, p < 0.001 ASRS-5: t = 6.3, p < 0.001 |
F(7,199) = 30.9 p < 0.0001 adj R2 = 0.50 | 70.6 | - |
| 2 | sex, age, OCD diagnosis, DOCS, ASRS-5 | χ2(1) = 0.77 p = 0.38 | OCD diagnosis: t = 2.6, p = 0.01 DOCS: t = 3.5, p < 0.001 ASRS-5: t = 8.1, p < 0.001 |
F(5,201) = 43.1 p < 0.0001 adj R2 = 0.51 | 67.8 | χ2(2) = 1.3 p = 0.53 |
| 3 | sex, age, CTD diagnosis, TTS, ASRS-5 | χ2(1) = 0.03 p = 0.87 | ASRS-5: t = 10.5, p < 0.001 | F(5, 201) = 29.8 p < 0.0001 adj R2 = 0.41 | 104.0 | χ2(2) = 37.4 p < 0.0001 |
| 4 | sex, age, CTD diagnosis, OCD diagnosis, TTS, DOCS | χ2(1) = 5.37 p = 0.02 | OCD diagnosis: t = 3.7, p < 0.001 DOCS: t = 5.5, p < 0.001 |
F(6,200) = 24.6 p < 0.0001 adj R2 = 0.41 | 106.2 | χ2(2) = 37.6 p < 0.0001 |
| 5 | sex, age, CTD diagnosis, OCD diagnosis, TTS, DOCS, ASRS-5, GAD-7, PHQ-9 | χ2(1) = 1.89 p = 0.17 | OCD diagnosis: t = 2.7, p = 0.007 DOCS: t = 2.0, p = 0.049 ASRS-5: t = 5.1, p < 0.001 |
F(9,197) = 24.6 p < 0.0001 adj R2 = 0.51 | 70.8 | χ2(2) = 3.8 p = 0.15 |
Null hypothesis of the Breusch-Pagan test is that the variance of the model residuals is constant; p<0.05 indicates significant heteroskedasticity.
Referent for LR is Model 1
Variables not displayed in this column were not significantly associated with ln(SGI) for the given model. Β coefficients are not reported.
VIF > 5 for TTS and CTD diagnosis in all models where these variables were included