Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ocul Surf. 2021 Nov 30;23:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.11.011

Table 3.

Relative composition of major sphingolipid classes in meibum and tears grouped by meibum quality.

Sphingolipid
Species
Good Quality (N=25) Mole
Percent
Poor Quality (N=25) Mole
Percent
P-Value
Median IQR Median IQR
Meibum
Cer 17.1 8.6 15.1 6.7 0.09
Hex-Cer 4.9 3.8 3.8 1.0 0.02
SM 65.8 13.2 75.9 6.3 <0.005
Sph 8.2 6.2 4.3 2.7 <0.005
Sa 3.3 3.1 1.8 1.7 0.006
Cer/SM* 0.25 0.18 0.20 0.10 0.02
Hex-Cer/SM* 0.07 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.007
Cer:Hex-Cer* 3.45 2.02 3.90 2.97 0.11
Tears
Cer 11.9 7.2 12.6 6.6 0.98
Hex-Cer 2.5 2.6 3.6 2.8 0.049
SM 75.0 8.1 77.4 10.0 0.07
Sph 3.4 2 4.5 5 0.07
S1P 4.6 3.9 2.0 5.6 0.02
Cer/SM* 0.17 0.10 0.16 0.09 0.48
Hex-Cer/SM* 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.09
Cer:Hex-Cer* 4.76 5.39 3.86 2.64 0.19

SPL=total sphingolipid; Cer=ceramide; Hex-Cer=hexosyl ceramide; SM=sphingomyelin; Sph=sphingosine; Sa=sphinganine; S1P=sphingosine 1-phosphate; IQR=interquartile range. Bioactive SPL.

*

Ratios were first calculated for each individual and then mean ratios were compared between groups