Table 2.

Summary of linear regression slope and Pearson correlation coeffícient (the latter in parentheses, all with p < 0.001) between cumulative peak MPS relative to those from the anisotropic WHIM VI.0 model when using the baseline brain material properties or by scaling up G₀/G_∞ by 2 or 4 times. Six experimental datasets were selected for comparison, including 2 high-rate cadaveric impacts, 2 mid-rate cadaveric impacts, and 2 in vivo loading conditions.

Scaling ratio	C288-t3	C380-t4	NDTA-t4	Vrot20dt30	Knutsen et al.	Lu et al.
Baseline	1.61 (0.62)	1.32 (0.20)	1.19 (0.60)	1.55 (0.35)	1.37 (0.65)	1.47 (0.49)
2	1.50 (0.34)	1.14 (0.23)	1.01 (0.47)	0.94 (0.48)	0.91 (0.68)	1.19 (0.43)
4 a	1.42	0.95	0.59	0.65	0.53	0.89

^aOnly linear regression slopes were reported, as the brain was obviously over-stiff relative to the baseline for the majority of cases when scaled by 4 times.