Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Feb 8;50(2):357–376. doi: 10.1002/jaba.376

Table 2.

Functional Analysis Results

Case Application Test Control Function
1 1 1.1 0.2 Escape
1 2 1.1 0.2 Escape
2 3 0.9 0.5 Escape
2 4 0.9 0.5 Escape
3 5 0.2 0.1 Inconclusive
4 6 48.3 10.5 Automatic; S1
5 7 4.2 2.2 Automatic; S2
6 8 1.1 0.1 Tangible
7 9 1 0.2 Attention
7 10 1 0.2 Attention
7 11 1.2 0.2 Escape
8 12 1.1 1.8 Automatic; S1
9 13 1.3 0.1 Automatic
9 14 1.3 0.1 Automatic
10 15 0.1 0 Social/Auto
11 16 10.9 6.1 Automatic; S2
12 17 11.4 0.4 Attention
12 18 11.4 0.4 Attention
13 19 54 0 Automatic; S1
14 20 36.1 2.5 Attention
15 21 2.07 - Automatic
16 22 1.4 0.4 Escape
17 23 0.9 0 Inconclusive
18 24 1.9 0 Automatic
19 25 10.4 0.2 Attention
20 26 0.8 0 Tangible
21 27 4.7 0.4 Tangible

Note. Results reported as responses per min. The test condition represents the relevant condition as indicated in the final column. S1 and S2 indicate automatically maintained SIB Subtypes 1 and 2, respectively in cases for which subtype was identified.