Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 18;42(2):128–161. doi: 10.1177/03331024211036152

Table 3.

Reasons for studies’ exclusion.

Author Reason for exclusion
1. Okayasu et al. 2020. Non randomisation. No control. Follow up at 4 weeks
2. Paudel et al. 2020 Non randomisation. Retrospective study. No control
3. Diep et al. 2019 Non randomisation. Case series. No control
4. Bris et al. 2019 Non randomisation. Case series
5. Adamo et al. 2020 Non randomisation. Unavailable post treatment result for control
6. Jeong 2019 Follow up at 2 weeks
7. Iris et al. 2017 Follow up at 4 weeks
8. Ilankizhai et al. 2016 Review paper
9. Aravindhan et al. 2014 Review paper
10. Miziara et al. 2015 Review paper
11. Van Heerden WFP et al., 2011 Review paper
12. Garg et al. 2017 Non randomisation. No control. Case series
13. Jimson et al. 2015 Review paper
14. Skrinjar et al. 2020 Follow up at 2 weeks
15. Suga et al. 2019 Non randomisation. No control
16. Pereira et al. 2020 Review paper
17. Nakase et al. 2004 Non randomisation. Unavailable inclusion criteria on glossodynia . Follow up at 4 weeks
18. Bessho et al. 1998 Unclear definition on glossodynia. May included second burning mouth syndrome
19. Grechko et al. 1996 Non randomisation. Study included second burning mouth syndrome
20. Bardellini et al. 2019 Follow up at 4 and 5 weeks
21. Ritchie et al. 2018 Review paper
22. Barbosa et al. 2018 Follow up at 4 weeks
23. Sikora et al. 2018 Follow up at 2 weeks
24. De Souza et al. 2018 Systematic review paper
25. Liu et al. 2018 Systematic review paper
26. Fenelon M et al., 2017 Non randomisation. Retrospective study
27. Haggman-Henrikson et al. 2017 Systematic review paper
28. Kuten-Shorrer et al. 2017 Non randomisation. No control
29. Restivo et al. 2017 Non randomisation. Case series. No control
30. Al-Maweri et al. 2017 Systematic review paper
31. Valenzuela et al. 2017 Follow up at 2 and 4 weeks
32. McMillan et al. 2016 Systematic review paper
33. Sugaya et al. 2016 Follow up at 2 weeks
34. Cui et al. 2016 Systematic review paper
35. Valenzuela et al. 2016 Follow up at 30 days
36. Kisely et al. 2016 Systematic review paper
37. Arduino et al. 2016 Follow up at 21 days and 5 weeks
38. Treldal et al. 2016 Follow up at 2 weeks
39. Zakrzewska et al. 2016 Systematic review paper
40. Jurisic Kveisic et al. 2015 Follow up at 4 weeks
41. Lopez-Jornet et al. 2013 Control arm included active study treatment
42. Komiyama et al. 2013 No control group
43. Ko et al. 2012 Non randomisation. No control. Follow up at 4 weeks
44. De Moraes et al. 2012 Review paper
45. Silvestre et al. 2012 Follow up at 1 week
46. Buchanan et al. 2010 Review paper
47. Scardina et al. 2010 Non randomisation
48. Kho et al. 2010 Non randomisation. Follow up at 4 weeks.
49. Lopez-Jornet et al. 2010 Review paper
50. Gremeau-Richard et al. 2010 Non comparable follow up time. Clonazepam follow up at 3 weeks and local anaesthesia at 15 min
51. Barker et al. 2009 Non control. Same group of drugs in comparison
52. Miziara et al. 2009 Non comparative outcome assessment
53. Cavalcanti et al. 2009 Follow up at 30 days
54. Toida et al. 2009 Included secondary burning mouth syndrome patients
55. Buchanan et al. 2008 Review paper
56. Minguez Serra et al. 2007 Review paper
57. Patton et al. 2007 Systematic review paper
58. Buchanan et al. 2005 Review paper
59. Zakrzewska et al. 2005 Systematic review paper
60. Gremeau -Richard et al. 2004 Follow up at 2 weeks
61. Petruzzi et al. 2004 Non randomisation. Follow up at 30 days
62. Femiano et al. 2004 Non randomisation
63. Zakrzewska et al. 2003 Systematic review paper
64. Scala et al. 2003 Review paper
65. Femiano 2002 Unsure overlapping of recruited patient pools in Femiano 2000 trial or Femano and Scully 2002 trial
66. Maina et al. 2002 Included secondary burning mouth syndrome patients
67. Zakrzewska et al. 2001 Systematic review paper
68. Femiano et al. 2000 Follow up at 1 month
69. Sardella et al. 1999 Follow up at 4 weeks
70. Formaker et al. 1998 Non randomisation. No definition on burning mouth syndrome
71. Grushka et al. 1998 Non randomisation. No control
72. Dym et al. 2020 Review paper