Table 3.
Two-level hierarchical generalized linear model of adolescent sexual debut (Model A) and number of sexual partners (Model B) by Wave III (N = 8,337)a,b
| Model A: Sexual debut |
Model B: Number of partners |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
|||||
| b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | |
| Intercept | 1.387*** | .065 | 1.692*** | .342 | — | — | — | — |
| Neighborhood characteristics | ||||||||
| Typec | ||||||||
| Upper middle class white suburban (ref.) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Middle class Hispanic/Asian suburb | −.130 | .108 | −.142 | .111 | −.248** | .079 | −.205* | .081 |
| Working class white rural | .242* | .099 | .293** | .103 | .148* | .070 | .228** | .072 |
| Poor black urban | .281 | .188 | .217 | .195 | .246* | .125 | .237 | .128 |
| Poor black rural | .310* | .136 | .482** | .142 | .237* | .092 | .440*** | .096 |
| Poor white urban | .135 | .146 | .032 | .150 | .119 | .102 | .059 | .105 |
| Working class mixed race urban | −.125 | .133 | −.173 | .139 | −.262** | .099 | −.220* | .102 |
| Poor Hispanic/immigrant urban | .026 | .142 | −.016 | .151 | −.305** | .101 | −.190 | .106 |
| Middle class black urban | .107 | .159 | .104 | .163 | .133 | .113 | .150 | .115 |
| Mixed class white urban | .287 | .216 | .259 | .219 | .202 | .144 | .170 | .145 |
| Permissive sexual climated | .123* | .049 | .077 | .051 | .120** | .036 | .073* | .036 |
| Demographics | ||||||||
| Age | .079*** | .051 | .014 | .013 | ||||
| Female | .363*** | .617 | .116** | .043 | ||||
| Two married biological parents | −.327*** | .066 | −.318*** | .044 | ||||
| Family socioeconomic status | −.036** | .012 | −.006 | .008 | ||||
| Individual characteristics | ||||||||
| Depression | −.264** | .084 | −.198*** | .056 | ||||
| Relative pubertal development | .105*** | .028 | .106*** | .019 | ||||
| Low self-control | .137* | .057 | .213*** | .038 | ||||
| Attachment to school | −.018 | .039 | −.040 | .026 | ||||
| College aspirations | .003 | .034 | .045* | .022 | ||||
| Religiosity | −.181*** | .031 | −.162*** | .020 | ||||
| Nonviolent delinquency | .433*** | .077 | .349*** | .049 | ||||
| Violent perpetration | .475*** | .082 | .325*** | .050 | ||||
| Family characteristics | ||||||||
| Family support | −.158* | .062 | −.177*** | .041 | ||||
| Parental attachment | −.022 | .076 | −.002 | .048 | ||||
| Parental monitoring | .143 | .098 | .071 | .066 | ||||
| Peer characteristics | ||||||||
| Unstructured socializing | .237*** | .029 | .171*** | .020 | ||||
| Random effects | ||||||||
| Level 2 intercept (SE) (95% CI) | .111 (.039) (.056–.219) | .105 (.038) (.052–.214) | .058 (.021)(.029–.117) | .059 (.020) (.030–.115) | ||||
| −2 Log likelihood | 8,008.723 | 7,630.009 | 25,277.570 | 24,672.380 | ||||
Source: National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent to Adult Health Wave I (1994–1995) and Wave III (2001–2002).
CI = confidence interval; ref = reference; SE = standard error.
Model A (sexual debut) specified as a logistic regression, Model B (number of partners) specified as an ordered logit.
All predictors are measured from Wave I.
Model also controls for years lived in neighborhood.
Grand mean centered.
p <.05;
p < .01;
p < .001 (two-tailed tests).