Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr;39(4):1368–1377. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1368-1377.2001

TABLE 6.

Best results obtained for the different anti-Chlamydia antibody assays

Assay Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Predictive value (+) (%) Predictive value (−) (%) False-positive rate (%) False-negative rate (%)
IgG anti-C. trachomatis (blot) (≥10 bands)a 79 84 69 90 16 21
IgM anti-C. trachomatis (blot) (≥2 bands)a 50 94 78 81 6 50
IgA anti-C. trachomatis (blot) (≥6 bands)a 71 87 71 87 13 29
IgG anti-C. trachomatis (blot) (≥10 bands) +
IgM anti-C. trachomatis (blot) (≥2 bands)a 86 81 67 93 19 14
IgA anti-C. trachomatis (blot) (≥6 bands) +
IgM anti-C. trachomatis (blot) (≥2 bands)a 79 81 65 89 19 21
IgG anti-LPSb 84 48 70 68 52 16
IgG anti-MOMPb 58 68 72 53 32 42
IgG anti-hsp60c 62 80 82 59 20 38
IgG anti-pgp3c 53 80 80 53 20 47
IgG anti-MOMP + pgp3c 71 67 76 61 33 29
IgG anti-hsp60 + pgp3c 76 77 83 68 23 24
IgG anti-C. trachomatis (MIF test)d 44 89 85 55 11 56
a

Positive patients were 14 patients with C. trachomatis urogenital infection, and negative individuals were 31 healthy blood donors. 

b

Positive patients were 45 patients with C. trachomatis urogenital infection, and negative individuals were 31 healthy blood donors. 

c

Positive patients were 45 patients with C. trachomatis urogenital infection, and negative individuals were 30 healthy blood donors. 

d

Positive patients were 25 patients with C. trachomatis urogenital infection, and negative individuals were 19 healthy blood donors.