Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0262676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262676

Table 4. Results of linear regression on participants’ food neophobia (both FNS-R and WTNF scores) predicted by covariates and socio-political ideology moderated by implicit associations between novel food and both foreigner outgroups and threat (Study 2).

FNS-R WTNF
β t p 95% CI Β t p 95% CI
Constant 44.78 < .001 2.41, 2.64 51.65 < .001 .68, .73
General neophobia .17 1.88 .063 -.01, .26 .06 .63 .530 -.02, .04
Openness to experience -.24 -2.93 .004 -.30, -.06 .13 1.50 .137 -.01, .05
Disgust sensitivity -.07 -.81 .418 -.20, .08 -.04 -.37 .713 -.04, .03
Sensation seeking -.07 -.74 .464 -.21, 09 .18 1.71 .089 .00, .07
Ideology .31 3.85 < .001 .12, 37 -.29 -3.35 .001 -.08, -.02
Novel food-Outgroup BIAT .21 2.66 .009 .04, .28 -.10 -1.20 .232 -.05, .01
Novel food-Threat BIAT .01 .06 .952 -.12, .12 .00 -.02 .986 -.03, .03
Ideology X Novel food-Outgroup BIAT .23 2.90 .004 .06, .32 -.18 -2.21 .029 -.07, .00
Ideology X Novel food-Threat BIAT -.03 -.34 .737 -.17, .12 .01 .11 .915 -.03, .04
R2 = .33, F(9,121) = 6.51, p < .001, f2 = .48 R2 = .22, F(9,121) = 3.77, p < .001, f2 = .28