Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0256752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256752

Table 3. Maximum decreases in minute ventilation after fentanyl bolus administration (%).

Healthy volunteers Opioid-tolerant patients
0.2 ng/mL group 0.5 ng/mL group 1 ng/mL group 2 ng/mL group 5 ng/mL group
Placebo BUP Treatment Difference Placebo BUP Treatment Difference Placebo BUP Placebo BUP Placebo BUP Treatment Differenceb
Fentanyl Dose 1 a N 6 6 6 6 2 2 3 3 3 3
LSM (95% CI) -60.9 (-73.5, -48.2) -53.1 (-65.8, -40.5) 7.7 (-3.8, 19.3) -51.3 (-64.3, -38.3) -26.2 (-40.0, -12.5) 25.1 (13.4, 36.8) -82.3 (-105.2, -59.3) -49.2 (-72.1, -26.3) -44.3 (-63.0, -25.6) -22.2 (-40.9, -3.5) -62.5 (-81.2, -43.8) -26.8 (-45.5, -8.1) 29.9 (19.6, 40.3)
p-value 0.1590 0.001 < .001
Fentanyl Dose 2 a N 6 4 6 6 2 2 3 3 3 3
LSM (95% CI) -82.4 (-92.7, -72.0) -70.3 (-82.8, -57.8) 12.1 (-2.5, 26.7) -79.0 (-89.4, -68.6) -47.4 (-57.8, -37.0) 31.6 (19.3, 43.8) -93.5 (-122.3, -64.6) -57.3 (-86.1, -28.4) -68.4 (-91.9, -44.8) -35.9 (-59.5, -12.4) -87.5 (-111.0, -63.9) -30.0 (-53.5, -6.5) 42.8 (23.8, 61.8)
p-value 0.0916 < .001 0.001
Fentanyl Dose 3 a N 2 4 4 6 1 2 3 3 2 3
LSM (95% CI) -100.0 (-142.3, -57.7) -83.2 (-113.2, -53.3) 16.8 (-35.1, 68.7) -93.6 (-123.6, -63.7) -71.9 (-96.4, -47.5) 21.7 (-16.9, 60.4) -100.0 (-145.3, -54.7) -71.8 (-103.8, -39.8) -79.3 (-105.5, -53.2) -46.1 (72.3, -20.0) -88.1 (-120.1, -56.1) -30.7 (-56.9, -4.6) 39.4 (15.7, 63.1)
p-value 0.3788 0.1716 0.008
Fentanyl Dose 4 a N 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 3 1 3
LSM (95% CI) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA -68.7 (-140.2, 2.8) -82.3 (-140.7, -23.9) -33.7 (-92.1, 24.7) -116.3 (-189.3, -42.2) -50.5 (-108.9, 7.8) 50.8 (27.7, 73.9)
p-value NA NA 0.006

BUP, buprenorphine; CI, confidence interval; LSM, least square mean; NA, not applicable. p<0.05 are presented in bold. Differences are LSM estimated treatment differences between buprenorphine and placebo.

aMaximum changes (%) in minute ventilation during first 10 minutes after each fentanyl administration compared to pre-fentanyl baseline.

b The three buprenorphine concentration level groups in patients were grouped for this analysis.