Skip to main content
Tissue Barriers logoLink to Tissue Barriers
. 2021 Oct 15;10(1):1982349. doi: 10.1080/21688370.2021.1982349

GAP junctions: multifaceted regulators of neuronal differentiation

Sarmistha Talukdar a,b,, Luni Emdad a,b,c,, Swadesh K Das a,b,c, Paul B Fisher a,b,c,
PMCID: PMC8794256  PMID: 34651545

ABSTRACT

Gap junctions are intercellular membrane channels consisting of connexin proteins, which contribute to direct cytoplasmic exchange of small molecules, substrates and metabolites between adjacent cells. These channels play important roles in neuronal differentiation, maintenance, survival and function. Gap junctions regulate differentiation of neurons from embryonic, neural and induced pluripotent stem cells. In addition, they control transdifferentiation of neurons from mesenchymal stem cells. The expression and levels of several connexins correlate with cell cycle changes and different stages of neurogenesis. Connexins such as Cx36, Cx45, and Cx26, play a crucial role in neuronal function. Several connexin knockout mice display lethal or severely impaired phenotypes. Aberrations in connexin expression is frequently associated with various neurodegenerative disorders. Gap junctions also act as promising therapeutic targets for neuronal regenerative medicine, because of their role in neural stem cell integration, injury and remyelination.

KEYWORDS: Connexin, differentiation, neuron, gap junctions, stem cells

1. Introduction: what are gap junctions?

Gap junctions (GJ) are intercellular membrane channels which facilitate direct cytoplasmic exchange of small molecules, substrates and metabolites between adjacent cells.1–3 The basic structural unit of the GJ is the connexon, consisting of 2 hemichannels (HCs) forming a cylinder like structure with a hydrophilic channel (Figure 1,4). These connexons span the plasma membranes of closely aligned cells, forming intercellular channels that help with the exchange of small molecules (less than 1200 Da). The GJ proteins, called connexin (Cx) (Figure 1), are named according to their predicted molecular weights.5,6 These proteins are encoded by a multi-gene family consisting of at least 20 members in mammals.3,7 Connexin protein subunits are tetra-spanning membrane proteins with three conserved extracellular cysteine residues. These conserved residues are crucial for docking.8 The connexin subunits differ mostly in their cytoplasmic loop and carboxy-terminal region. The S–S structure in the protein represents conserved disulfide bonds in the extracellular domains of connexins.8 There are several types of connexins and these connexins display distinguishing distribution phenotypes in various tissues, with many tissues and cells expressing multiple connexins. In the central nervous system there are eleven subtypes of connexins.3 The specific subset and the varied expression of connexins depend on cell type as well as the developmental stage3,9 (Table 1). Most electrophysiological studies of connexins have concentrated on studying the conductance of homotypic GJ channels, consisting of identical connexin proteins (Figure 1). GJ channels in a given cell type can also develop by the union of HCs each comprising homologous, but different connexin proteins. GJ channels connect the cytoplasm of contacting cells and coordinate electric and metabolic activity, whereas HCs assist in the communication between intra- and extracellular compartments thereby providing a diffusional scheme for ions and small molecules.39 The main function of connexin HCs is attributed to the formation of GJ channels, however, recent research also suggests the presence of functional connexin HCs in non-junctional membranes. These channels facilitate uptake of small molecules as well as release of autocrine/paracrine signaling molecules to the extracellular compartments. In the central nervous system, GJ channels and HCs play a critical role in mediating ischemic tolerance40 and they establish adhesive interactions.41 HCs release physiological molecules that are relevant for intercellular signaling under normal brain conditions. However, HCs also play a significant role in inducing homeostatic imbalance that is frequently observed in diverse brain disease. Each HC represents an assembly of six connexin protein subunits, and thus a GJ constitutes a total of 12 connexins.8 A single cell can express more than one connexin type that initiates expression of nonidentical connexins resulting in a heteromeric HC or connexon.5 Three different types of GJs have been reported depending on the composition: homomeric/homotypic, heteromeric and heterotypic8 (Figure 1). Homomeric or heteromeric HCs are composed of identical or different types of connexin isoforms, respectively. Homotypic or heterotypic GJs comprise two identical or two different types of HCs, respectively. Pannexins are another form of membrane channels.42 Of the three family members only Panx1 and Panx2 are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS).43 Panx1 has paracrine functions as an ATP release channel along with the release of “find-me” signals for apoptotic cell clearance. Panx1 was also found to be connected to calcium signaling, and tumor growth suppression of gliomas. Panx2 along with gap junctions are known to control differentiation in neurons.44 Gap junction plaques are relatively large structures on the plasma membrane, composed of hundreds or up to thousands of single individual channels, where gap junction channels are concentrated in specialized plaques of plasma membrane when cells are in close apposition.45 These structures form as free HCs that are exposed to the plaque area of the plasma membrane, where each cell adds newly synthetized HCs (Figure 1d, [46]).45 These structures are important for exchanging information between neighboring cells, thereby supporting synchronized and concerted responses45 (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Connexins, connexons and gap junction channels. A, Connexins have four transmembrane domains, which are connected by two extracellular loops and one intracellular loop. The N- and C-termini are both located in the cytosol. B, Connexins form hexamers called connexons. Connexins can combine with either the same or different connexin isoforms, forming homomeric or heteromeric connexons, respectively. C, Connexons form gap junction channels by interacting with either identical homomeric or heteromeric connexons in adjacent cells, forming homotypic channels, or with different homomeric or heteromeric connexons, forming heterotypic channels. (From [4]) D, Connexin proteins synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) oligomerize to form connexon complexes. The connexons are transported to the cell surface and inserted into the plasma membrane where they form hemichannels. These hemichannels can dock with hemichannels of an opposing cell and cluster to form a gap junction plaque, characterized by a 2–4 nm gap between the two cell membranes. Gap junction plaques are removed from the cell surface through endoexocytosis, which results in the formation of an annular gap junction. The annular gap junction is then degraded through lysosomal proteolysis (From [46]).

Table 1.

Connexin subtype and cellular expression in the CNS, adapted from [3]

Connexin subtype Cell type (expressed stage) References
26 neuron 10–12
astrocyte 13
29 oligodendrocyte 14
30 astrocyte (matured) 15,16
32 neuron (matured) 17
oligodendrocyte 18–23
36 neuron 24–26
oligodendrocyte 27
microglia 27
37 neuron 28
40 neuron (developing) 28
astrocyte 13
43 neuron (mainly developing) 10,17,29,30
astrocyte 1,31,32
microglia (activated) 33,34
45 neuron 35,36
astrocyte 13
46 astrocyte 13
47 neuron 37
astrocyte 9
oligodendrocyte 38

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Schematic representation of GJ intercellular communication and HC-mediated cell-to-extracellular environment communication. Cxns, composed of 4 transmembrane domains and an intracellular carboxy-tail, are organized into homomeric or heteromeric HCs. GJ plaques are structures of hundreds up to thousands of single channels, which mediate exchanges of small molecules, substrates and metabolites. Those structures show free HCs exposed to the plaque border, where each cell adds newly synthetized HCs. These structures are crucial players of the GJIC and HC-mediated cell-to-extracellular environment communication and lead to the information exchanges between neighboring cells favoring synchronized and concerted responses. Cx, connexin; HC, hemichannel; GJ, gap junction; GJIC, gap junctional intercellular communication. [From 45].

2. What is neuronal differentiation?

Neuronal differentiation is a complex cellular process that integrates several signaling pathways and extrinsic factors to fuel distinct electrophysiological, morphological, and transcriptional changes, leading to the development of neurons47 (Figure 3, [48]). This process depends on the molecular signals received from several hormones including neurotransmitters, accessory neurotrophic factors (such as nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), neurotrophin-4 (NT-4)), and chemokines that are translated into downstream intracellular responses, largely by G-protein-coupled receptors. Components of these processes that regulate neurite outgrowth have significant implications in neuronal survival after injury.47 Neuronal differentiation in vivo occurs during development. Neuronal replacement therapies usually utilize the in vitro differentiated neurons from embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells, or the direct reprogramming of differentiated adult cells though the expression of transcription factors, signaling molecules or treatment with small molecules47,49 (Figure 3, [48]).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Pathway from pluripotent stem cells to neural cell populations. Fertilization and subsequent cellular divisions create the embryonic blastocyst, where pluripotent ESCs are derived (from the inner cell mass; ICM). Additionally, pluripotent and multipotent-like cells can be created via transduction of various factors into differentiated tissue, such as fibroblasts. In vitro analyses of pluripotent and multipotent neural stem cells are integral for understanding aspects of neural differentiation. The in vivo niche of stem cells contains a considerable diversity of biomolecules whose roles still need be deciphered. Exposure of ESCs to various growth factors in serum-free media such as fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) and epithelial growth factor (EGF) allows selection of cell lines possessing a neural fate. Neural stem cells can also be acquired from adult tissue and expanded in vitro. (From [48]).

Human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research has significantly advanced human neural differentiation research. Using the right culture conditions, neural progenitor (NP) cells are generated from pluripotent hESCs.50–58 There is potential to generate other lineage cells (such as embryoid bodies) as contaminants in this process.52 Under suitable culture conditions, when the hESCs differentiate into NP cells, the NP cells continue to express SOX2 and begin expressing other neuroepithelial markers, such as Nestin, SOX1, SOX3, PSA-NCAM, and MUSASHI-1.52 The NP cells next form “neural rosettes” another morphological marker of hESC differentiation into neural cells.52,59 Several signaling molecules, supplements/additives and conditioned media have been used by researchers to help the process of differentiation of hESCs into NP cells.51,52,57,60–62 Stromal-derived inducing activity (SDIA)-mediated differentiation is one method that can promote efficient neural tissue generation, however, this co-culture technique can introduce unknown stromal factors of non-human origin in culture, which may cause problems in comprehending neural differentiation,52). Retinoic acid (RA) is another factor that is crucial for many aspects of neural development and activity, varying from axon regeneration in the adult, to neuronal differentiation and patterning of the neural plate and neural tube in the early embryo.52,63 Retinoic acid is usually used for neuronal differentiation media at concentrations between 1–10 μM.51,52,61,62,64–68 The BMP-antagonist noggin is also used in the neuronal differentiation of hESC cultures grown adherently on laminin or matrigel52,64,69,70 or in suspension.52,71 FGF is another factor used as a supplement for neuronal differentiation. FGF molecules might play two different roles during neuronal development in the embryo: they are capable of inducing a “pro” neural state at an early stage, while acting as an antagonist to BMP signaling, which helps in establishing the neural phenotype.52,53

3. The role of gap junctions in neurons

In the CNS, various cell types are coupled by GJs, which play an important role in maintaining normal function.3 Neuronal GJs are critical for electrical coupling and also contribute to the functional recovery after cell injury.3 Recent studies indicate the critical importance of the temporal pattern of connexin expression and gap junctional coupling during neuronal differentiation.3 The connexins that are usually found in neurons are Cx36, Cx30.2, Cx31.1, Cx40, Cx45, Cx50 and Cx57.24,72–79 The important role that connexins play in the functioning of neurons is listed in Table 2. GJs control cell signaling, differentiation, and growth100 by supporting intercellular communication at plaques on the cell-to-cell interface and also by mediating GJ-independent signaling.45,101,102 The free HCs present throughout the plasma membrane are also made up of connexin, allowing complex chemical trafficking between cytoplasm and the extracellular environment.45,103,104 GJs are crucial for electrotonic coupling between neurons. Electrotonic coupling has been shown in many areas of the CNS and is important for the regulation of neuronal synchronization.3,105–108 In the developmental stages, a high degree of intercellular coupling between neurons has been observed.3,109–112 These developmental areas consist of mitotically active epithelial cells lining the ventricles that express Cx43 and Cx26,3,10 and this coupling involves both neuronal precursors and radial glia.3,11 Thus, gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) creates cortical domains in the developing neocortex that give rise to the adult architecture3,109,111,113 (Figures 4, 114). Cx2612,25 and Cx3624,26 are expressed in the developing brain, consistent with the transient gap junctional coupling reported in the neocortex. Cx47 is also expressed in the CNS.37 Cx37 is expressed mostly in motor neurons and Cx40 is evident in developing neurons of the spinal cord.28 In the adult CNS, neurons in the cortex and hippocampus, express mainly Cx3625 and Cx4536 (Table 1). These neuronal GPs are crucial in the formation of electrical synapses.89,90 Cx45 is also highly expressed in the developing brain and while in the adult brain its expression is localized to the olfactory nerves, cerebral cortex, hippocampus (part of allocortex) and thalamus.36,115 Cx45 are the most highly expressed Cxs in neurons and Cx32 is found in oligodendrocytes. Cx45 is also expressed in glial cells. In the retina, Cx26 is expressed in horizontal cells116 and Cx36 in AII amacrine cells,117 in spite of the fact that Cx26 is not present in the neurons of adult cortex and hippocampus.118 HCs of horizontal cells regulate the activity of the Ca2+ channels and subsequent glutamate release.116 Cx43 knockout mice display abnormal migration of the neural crest.96,119 The expression of Cx32 in mature neurons is an area of controversy.3,25,120 Cx32 knockout mice show demyelination in the peripheral nervous system3,83,84 along with neuronal hyperexcitability as well as myelin defects in the neocortex,85 and amplified apoptosis.121 Cx36 knockout mice show selective impairment of hippocampal gamma oscillations.88 Knockout of other neuronal candidates, Cx26, Cx45, is lethal.35 In vitro studies have helped elucidate gap junctional coupling in neuronal differentiation. During the neuronal differentiation of NT2 human embryonal carcinoma cells in response to retinoic acid (RA) the expression of Cx43 and the level of gap junctional coupling progressively disappear.3,122 Blocking of GJs disrupts retinoic acid-induced neuronal differentiation of both human NT2123 and mouse P19 cells.10 In addition, blocking of HCs also affects the differentiation of NT2/D1 progenitor cells, signifying HCs also contribute to neuronal differentiation.124 Programmed cell death is critical for development of the CNS as it regulates neuronal circuit formation and establishes the final number of neurons.72 A role for GJs in cell death/survival during development, glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity and neuronal injury has been demonstrated (Figure 572 Several connexins appear to be important for this process, however, the role of Cx36 in the death or survival of neurons is still controversial.72

Table 2.

The observed abnormalities in connexin knockout mice, adapted from [3]

Knockout mouse Abnormalities References
Cx26 embryonal lethal 80
(Cx26fl/fl, Otog-cre) hearing impairment 81
Cx30 severe hearing impairment 82
Cx32 demyelination in PNS 83,84
hyperexcitability in CNS 85
enhanced neuronal injury in ischemia 86
Cx36 visual deficit 87
synchronization defect in hippocampus 88
disturbed synchronous inhibitory activity 89
disrupted gamma frequency oscillations in cortex
Vision; electrical coupling between mouse rods and cones
90
91
Cx43 neonatal lethal 92,93
subtle neural changes in embryo 94
neural crest migration defect 95,96
disturbance of neural migration in embryonic neocortex
Memory consolidation
17
92
(Cx43+/−) enhanced neuronal injury in ischemia 97,98
(Cx43fl/fl,GFAP-cre) increased spreading depression in hippocampus 97
  enhanced neuronal injury in ischemia  
Cx45 embryonic lethal 35
Cx47 vacuolation in nerve fibers 38
(Cx47/32 double) severe demyelination in CNS 38,99

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The role of gap junction coupling and hemichannels in radial glial cell proliferation. Radial glial coupling and hemichannel activity are regulated during the course of neurogenesis and within each cell cycle. Radial glial cell gap junction coupling is greatest during mid-neurogenesis and decreases in late neurogenesis. During the cell cycle, cells uncouple from clusters during M phase and recouple during S phase in mid-neurogenesis or late S or G2 phase in late neurogenesis. During late neurogenesis, hemichannels on S phase radial glia initiate Ca2+ waves by releasing ATP which binds to P2Y1 receptors on adjacent cells inducing an IP3-mediated release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. Additionally, during each cell cycle, the levels of Cx26 and Cx43 fluctuate such that Cx26 and Cx43 levels are at their peak during M phase and S phase, respectively. Pharmacologically blocking coupling or Ca2+ waves inhibits entry into S phase of the cell cycle. [From 114].

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Glutamate-dependent excitotoxicity during neuronal injury. (a) Traditional model of the mechanisms for glutamate-dependent excitotoxicity. (b) Alternative model of the mechanisms of glutamate-dependent excitotoxicity. (c) This figure illustrates key points of the alternative model. In all figures:, Neuronal death caused directly by overactivation of N-methyl-D-aspatate receptors (NMDARs); (Baharvand), Existing neuronal gap junctions (GJs) contribute substantially to neuronal death caused by overactivation of NMDARs; (Baharvand), New neuronal gap junctions are induced by activation of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and also contribute to glutamate-dependent neuronal death; (Akopian), Pharmacological or genetic blockade of neuronal gap junction channels (GJCs) reduces glutamate-dependent neuronal death. In a,b: the sign (+) indicates the increase in receptor activity or expression of Cx36. In b: a possibility is illustrated that some Ca2+-dependent molecules (or Ca2+ itself) serve as gap junction-permeable death signals (b(Baharvand)); Ca2+ overload also directly induces neuronal death (b), however, this is not the main driver of neuronal death, rather the key determinant for expansion of cell death is neuronal GJCs (b)64 [From 72].

4. The role of GAP junctions in neuropathological conditions

GJs regulate not only development, but also the maintenance of the physiological functions of multicellular organisms.24,35,45,125 As a result, disturbance in the functioning of GJs, HCs, and Cxs, disrupts healthy cellular communication, leading to pathological conditions with different degrees of severity, including brain cancer and degenerative diseases. 126, 45, 127Modifications in Cxs can lead to severe complications of tissue functioning and even lethal phenotypes.45,128,129 Accordingly, the expression of Cxs in tissues and organs occurs throughout life starting from the embryo stage to adult stages and is stringently regulated,45 and often a cause of neurodegenerative disorders.

Neurodegenerative diseases are one of the major causes of disability and death in patients. Extensive research has been done to develop appropriate therapeutic strategies45 to control these diseases. The involvement of Cxs in the initiation and progression of various neurodegenerative diseases makes these proteins excellent therapeutic targets.45,126,130,131 Many researchers have shown that homeostatic imbalances observed during neurodegeneration are regulated by GJ-independent increased membrane permeability related to HC activity in the CNS.45,132–134 GJs can also cause increased secondary harmful effects through cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses, resulting in secondary cell death and neuronal loss.45,135,136

Gap junctional communication between activated microglia at the site of a pathophysiological condition might enhance the release of cytokines, leading to inflammatory responses that cause neurodegenerative effects. This is how several degenerative disorders, such as glaucoma135), traumatic brain injury,137,138 stroke,139,140 Alzheimer’s disease141, 142 and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)-related motor neuron loss143 are initiated and progress. These neurodegenerative conditions are associated with reactive astrogliosis, mononuclear phagocyte activation, neuronal injury, and neuronal death. These varied responses are regulated by connexins such as Cx36, Cx43, Cx30, Cx32, Cx29, and Cx47.126,127 Depending on the nature of the injury and the cell types affected either upregulation or downregulation of a specific connexon could signal either “pro-death” or “pro-survival” effects in neurons.126,127,135 For example, Cx43, one of the highly expressed Cxs in the CNS regulates different mechanisms in the CNS ranging from the regulation of the blood brain barrier (BBB) to the modulation of integrative brain functions (i.e., learning, memory, and behavior).144 Aberrant Cx43 expression can increase GJ-mediated coupling, and cause increased HC activity during in vivo astrocyte-mediated toxicity.143 Blocking GJs or HCs provide neuroprotection to motor neurons cultured with SOD1G93A astrocytes (astrocytes carrying the superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1G93A) mutation induce wild-type motor neuron degeneration in vivo), suggesting a prodegenerative role of Cx43 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or ALS.143 Similar effects are seen in hypoxia, ischemia, Alzheimer’s disease, and glaucoma. 130,137,145,146. GJ-mediated neuronal death is usually caused by overactivation of N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptors.72 Activation of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors cause formation of new GJs, which also assist in glutamate-dependent neuronal death.72,147 In contrast, pharmacological72,148 or genetic147,148 blocking of neuronal GJs decrease this glutamate-dependent neuronal death. Ca2+-dependent molecules (or Ca2+ itself) can also serve as GJ-permeable cell death signals,72,149 and in such cases Ca2+ overload triggers neuronal death.72 Astrocyte GJs are commonly associated with neuronal disorders, such as brain ischemia, Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy. GJs may also contribute to the degree of malignancy and metastasis of brain tumors.3 Moreover, as hypersynchronous neuronal activity is a characteristic feature of convulsions, increased gap junctional communication also contributes to the initiation and maintenance of seizures.150–152 The importance of connexins, GJs and HCs in CNS neuropathology deserves further study especially the function of GJs in the neural cell network, involving neurons, astrocytes, microglia and oligodendrocytes.3

5. The role of GAP junctions in embryonic cortical development and differentiation

Multiple putative roles of neuronal GJ communication during development have been proposed. These functions are based on observations from studies investigating developmental changes, GJ communication and Cx36 expression, as well as utilization of knockdown, knock-in and mutational approaches. In total these studies support the concept that neuronal GJs can regulate synaptogenesis,72,76 neuronal differentiation,72,153 migration72,154 and neural circuit formation as well as maturation.155,156 GJs can regulate these processes through exchange of Ca2+, metabolites and second messengers (such as glutamate, glutamine, D-serine, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and lactate) between cells, which provide clues for the coordination of metabolic and transcriptional activities in developing neurons.125 Furthermore, GJs also assist in generation of the highly synchronized excitatory electrical activity. This network-driven activity is a hallmark of the developing brain157 and it depends on collaboration between GJs and chemical neurotransmitter receptors.72,155,158

The development of the cerebral cortex from the neuroepithelium into a complex brain architecture supporting advanced cognition is highly dependent on the formation of a network of intercellular signaling.114 GJs are abundantly expressed during embryonic development and they support cell–cell contact and communication.114 Even though GJs aid in neural progenitor coupling, they also act as HCs facilitating the spread of calcium waves across progenitor cell populations, which serve as adhesive molecules helping in neuronal migration. In total, GJs have complex roles during the cortical development stages and utilize diverse strategies for effective intercellular communication114 (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

The adult subventricular zone (SVZ) and subgrandular zone (SGZ) support neurogenesis. Adult neural progenitor cells (NPCs) are defined by their capacity to proliferate and replenish neuronal and glial cell numbers. Antigenic markers used to distinguish between lineages are listed. [From 159].

During the different stages of embryonic development, embryonic cells proliferate as well as develop specific features and differentiate into different cell types, which ultimately become organized into different tissues and organs.10 Development of the nervous system involves an intricate series of events involving coordinated neuronal and astroglial differentiation.10 This coordination of growth and differentiation is regulated, at least partly, by exchange of small ions and molecules through the intercellular GJ channels.123 Studies utilizing NTera2/clone D1 (NT2/D1) cells, which are CNS precursors, show that these cells differentiate into NT2-N neurons in the CNS after treatment with retinoic acid (RA) and antiproliferative agents.123 In another study, the effect of GJ blockers, 18 alpha-glycyrrhetinic acid (GRA) and carbenoxolone (CBX) on neuronal differentiation was compared to the effect induced by oleanolic acid (OLA) and glycyrrhizic acid (GZA), which are inactive GRA analogs.123 They observed that both control- (inactive blockers) and GJ blocker-treated samples expressed decreased Cx43, after 4 weeks of RA treatment. While control cells treated with RA displayed decreased cytokeratin, vimentin and nestin expression, supporting the characteristics of NT2-N neuronal differentiation,123 cells treated with GJ blockers did not show any significant decrease. Moreover, the average number of MAP2 (a neuronal differentiation marker)-positive NT2-N differentiated neurons in the group treated with the GJ blockers was less than 7% of that of the control group.123 These results support the importance of GJ intercellular communications in this differentiation process.

The occurrence of gap-junctional coupling is also significantly correlated with specific developmental events.160 HC activation represents a vital step in the establishment of Ca2+ waves, which help in coordinating cell cycle events during early prenatal neurogenesis, whereas both HCs and/or GJs regulate precursor cell division and migration during late prenatal neurogenesis.160 A novel group of proteins conspicuously expressed in the brain, called pannexins also form HCs. This suggests that there are proteins other than connexins that mediate these intricate processes.160

Radial glial coupling and HC activity are also important during neurogenesis. Radial glial cell GJ coupling is observed to be highest during mid-neurogenesis, which later decreases during late neurogenesis.114,161 The HCs present on S phase radial glia initiate waves of Ca2+ signaling by releasing ATP, which then binds to P2Y1 receptors on the adjacent cells causing an IP3-mediated release of Ca2+ during late neurogenesis stages.114,162 Moreover, expression of the GJ proteins Cx26 and Cx43 levels are observed to be at their peak during M phase and S phase, respectively.114,163 The importance of coupling is implied by pharmacological studies where blocking coupling or Ca2+ waves was observed to inhibit entry of the cells into the S phase of the cell cycle.114,161,162 After radial glia divide asymmetrically, the newly formed neurons need to migrate to the appropriate lamina of the cortical plate.114 Radial glial cells also assist in this process of guiding the new neurons to their destination apart from being the stem cells of the developing cortex. The newly formed neurons migrate in very close association with radial glial fibers114,159,164,165 (Figure 7) and GJs possibly facilitate communication between the radial fibers and the migrating neurons.17,114,166–168

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Connexon-Connexon mediated adhesion domains. In addition to forming functional intercellular channels, docking of compatible connexons between radial glia (yellow) and NPCs (gold) directs migration of NPCs Docking and undocking enables the “rolling” of NPCs along their radial glial guides to their final location before terminal differentiation. Adhesion can be channel-independent without requiring exchange of small molecules or functional channel openings. [From 159].

Additionally, studies involving conditionally immortalized mouse hippocampal multipotent progenitor cells (MK31 cells) demonstrate strong coupling by GJs expressing Cx43 during early neuronal ontogeny.169 However, the coupling strength and expression of Cx43 declined after the progenitor cells went through neuronal differentiation post interleukin 7 (IL-7) treatment alone or after combined treatment with basic fibroblast growth factor, IL-7, and transforming growth factor α169 In addition, the GJs express Cx40 and Cx33 during the intermediate stage of neuronal differentiation.169,170,171 These studies point toward a loss of coupling during differentiation of neural progenitor cells involving downregulation of Cx43 coupled with enhanced expression of Cx33 and Cx40,169 suggesting complex dynamics of Cx expression during neuronal differentiation. Fluctuation in the expression of other connexins such as Cx26, which initially increase and then decrease by the third postnatal week, while that of Cx32 increases, has also been reported).114,172 The expression of these GJs is also specific to defined cell types: Cx43 and Cx26 are expressed in neurons and radial glia during development,114,166 but their expression is largely restricted to astrocytes in the adult, whereas Cx26 and Cx45 are the most highly expressed Cxs in neurons and Cx32 is found in oligodendrocytes. Cx45 is also expressed in glial cells. Also, knockdown of Cx43 decreases the proportion of cells that express mature neuronal markers postnatally such as NeuN and MAP2].166,172 Cx32, Cx43 and Cx31 has also been shown to regulate neurite outgrowth.24,114,169,173 GJ-mediated intercellular communication is also crucial for the growth and survival of mouse neural progenitor cells (NPCs).174 In the presence of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), NPCs express the gap junction protein Cx43 and are Lucifer Yellow fluorescent dye-coupled,174 however, in the absence of bFGF, expression of Cx43 and dye coupling is reduced, and the cells stop proliferating and instead differentiate into neurons.174 A role of Panx1 GJ proteins has been proposed in the regulation of neural stem cell survival, neuronal maturation and synaptic plasticity, along with normal cognitive functioning.42 Gap junctional communication in this manner helps maintain NPCs in a self-renewing state.174

6. The role of GAP junctions in transdifferentiation toward neurons

The term transdifferentiation, which is also known as lineage reprogramming, was first used by Selman and Kafatos in 1974.175,176 During this complex phenomena, one type of mature somatic cell transforms into another type of mature somatic cell bypassing an intermediate pluripotent state.175,176 This process is induced mainly by the exogenous expression of lineage-specific transcription factors (TFs) and by chemical mediators.176 Recently, in vitro transdifferentiation of patient-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) into neurons has been reported and this process could potentially be important for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.177 During this process, MSC markers such as CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD166 were downregulated and the neuronal marker, Tuj1, was upregulated.177 The MSCs transformed from a fibroblastoid morphology into a neuronal morphology with round cell bodies and neurite-like processes. In addition, they were functionally active as depolarization evoked action potentials in the transdifferentiated cells. MSCs express Cx43 and Cx45 as well as trace levels of Cx26, Cx37- and Cx40, which allowed transfer of microinjected Lucifer yellow. However, the differentiation process elevated the levels of Cx26 and decreased Cx43, while reducing the dye transfer. Treatment with a GJ coupling inhibitor, carbenoxolone (CBX), changed connexin expression modestly and had little effect on neuronal differentiation.177 These studies highlight the complexity of GJ functioning in neuronal transdifferentiation from MSCs. Human embryonic fibroblasts and mouse embryonic fibroblasts can also be converted into neuronal cells using chemical modifiers, along with forced expression-specific transcriptional factors.178,179 However, the role of GJs in this transdifferentiation process from fibroblasts has not at this time been reported.

7. The role of GAP junctions in neural stem cell graft integration

Neural stem cell (NSC)-based regeneration is a promising treatment strategy for neuropathological conditions NSCs secrete soluble factors and can differentiate into neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.176 NSCs can be obtained by either direct isolation from primary tissues, differentiation from pluripotent stem cells or by transdifferentiation from somatic cells.176 NSC transplantation-based therapies for the treatment of numerous neural defects and injuries have been widely investigated in animal models and clinical trials.176

Spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers severe damage to the neuronal elements of the spinal cord including separating of axon tracts and cell death. The primary mechanical damage is followed by multiple secondary damaging cascades that lead to loss of tissue and functioning.180 Connexins play a prominent role in the secondary phase of SCI by regulating cell death signaling through widespread glial networks.180 These gap junction-mediated networks are supported by connexin intercellular channels and the formation of pore-like hemichannels formed by both connexins and pannexins. Several studies have been conducted on the distribution and functional role of connexins in the spinal cord and these studies show that connexin-formed gap junctions undergo cell-to-cell coupling between neurons, adjacent astrocytes, and astrocytes/oligodendrocytes.180 Cx36 is expressed in neuron GJs, Cx30 and Cx43 are expressed in astrocyte/astrocyte GJs, Cx29, Cx32, are expressed in oligodendrocyte/astrocyte GJs and Cx47 is associated with the major heterotypic channels composed of Cx43-Cx47 and Cx30-Cx32180 (Figure 8a). Following SCI, Cx43 expression is elevated in astrocytes resulting in aberrant release of ATP from the perilesional region. The ATP release initiates destructive inflammatory responses including recruitment of microglia and macrophages to the damaged area, resulting in increased secondary expansion of the primary lesion180 (Figure 8b). As described earlier, the coupling of neurons by GJs (i.e., electrical synapses) and the expression of the neuronal GJ protein, Cx36, is transiently increased during early postnatal development,72 which decreases and then remains low in the adult, confined to specific subsets of neurons. However, following neuronal injury [such as ischemia, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and epilepsy], the coupling and expression of Cx36 increases.72

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Structure and distribution of the main connexin proteins in the spinal cord before and after spinal cord injury (SCI). (a) Gap junction channels are produced by the conjoining of two hemichannels, with one hemichannel provided by each cell. Compared to the closed state (∼1.8 nm), opened channels (∼2.5 nm) allow the transfer of substances less than 1 kDa between the cytoplasm of two cells, including nutrients, metabolites, K+, ATP, cAMP, and Ca2 + . (b) Each hemichannel is composed of six individual connexin proteins, which contain four transmembrane domains. The cytoplasmic loop (CL), amino (n), and carboxy (c) terminals are located on the cytoplasmic side, with multiple regulatory phosphorylation sites located on the C termini. There are two extracellular loops (E1 and E2) which contain three highly conserved cysteine bonds that play a role in the docking of hemichannels from opposing cells via intramolecular cysteine/cysteine bonds. (C) In the spinal cord, there is a large distribution of connexins. Neuron/neuron gap junctions contain Cx36, astrocyte/astrocyte junctions contain Cx30 and Cx43 and oligodendrocyte/astrocyte gap junctions contain Cx29, Cx32, and Cx47 with the major heterotypic channels composed of Cx43Cx47 and Cx30Cx32. (d) Following SCI, Cx43 expression is increased in astrocytes. This causes an uncontrolled release of the small molecule ATP from the perilesional region. ATP release leads to the activation of a destructive inflammatory response including recruitment of microglia and macrophages to the site of injury, which causes an increased secondary expansion of the lesion. [From 180].

In some studies, astrocytic Cx43 HC is negatively involved in the remyelination process by favoring local inflammation, and thus inhibiting Cx43 HC could be an interesting treatment strategy for injury.181 The process of integration of exogenous NSCs and its progeny into recipient brain is a promising strategy for repair of injury that will benefit from experiments providing more mechanistic insights.182 GJ-mediated communications help transplanted NSCs to regulate host network activity, including synchronized calcium fluctuations.182 In addition, the NSCs also have cytoprotective effects on the host neurons, helping them survive death-inducing conditions and thereby reduce symptoms of secondary injury, e.g., reactive astrogliosis. GJs (containing Cx43) that are formed between NSCs and host cells at risk are correlated with rescue of neurons. Both in vitro and in vivo cytoprotective effects of NSCs were eliminated when GJ formation or function was suppressed by pharmacologic and/or RNA-inhibition strategies. This highlights the seminal role of gap-junctional coupling in the regulation of modulatory, homeostatic, and protective actions of NSCs on host systems as well as establishing functional networks for regenerative repair.182

Coupling among ependymal cells is down-regulated during post-natal development and increased after spinal cord injury, which correlates with up-regulation of Cx26 and rescued proliferation.183 Blocking connexin resulted in decreased injury-induced proliferation of ependymal cells.183 Thus, connexins are important for the functioning of ependymal cells in response to injury, representing another strategy of stem cell-based repair (Figure 9).184

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Schematic representation of how blocking and upregulating different connexins could aid in the repair, differentiation and regeneration of neurons.

8. Conclusion

GJs play essential roles in the formation and functioning of neurons. They mediate cell-to-extracellular environment communication and regulate the information exchanges between neighboring cells that favor synchronized and concerted responses. They regulate not only differentiation from embryonic precursors, but can also regulate transdifferentiation, neuropathological conditions and even neuronal death. Because of these properties they are important in the treatment of spinal cord injury or traumatic brain injury.179

9. Future perspectives

Humans are unfortunately limited in their ability to regenerate nerve cells, posing significant issues for the treatment of injury and diseases of the nervous system. Neuronal differentiation techniques using embryonic, pluripotent and multipotent stem cells and even transdifferentiation from somatic cells holds great promise for treatment of various neurodegenerative diseases and recovery from injury. Different research groups are working on clinical trials that involve NSC transplantation in patients with ischemic injury and ALS, with preclinical studies being implemented for future cell-based treatments of brain cancer, ischemic spastic paraplegia, chronic spinal cord injury, and chronic stroke. Since GJs play seminal roles in neuronal differentiation, combining existing strategies with appropriate GJ-based therapies utilizing patient-specific stem cells offer significant potential in regenerative medicine by providing patients with genetically identical matches for treatment of diseased and damaged tissue.

Acknowledgments

Support from the Human and Molecular Genetics Development Fund, the Virginia Commonwealth University Institute of Molecular Medicine (VIMM), and the VCU Massey Cancer Center is appreciated. PBF holds the Thelma Newmeyer Corman Chair in Oncology in the MCC.

Funding Statement

Support from the Human and Molecular Genetics Development Fund, the Virginia Commonwealth University Institute of Molecular Medicine (VIMM), and the VCU Massey Cancer Center is appreciated.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • 1.Bosone C, Andreu A, Echevarria D.. Gap junctional communication in brain secondary organizers. Dev Growth Differ. 2016. [Epub 2016 Jun 8];58(5):80–101. doi: 10.1111/dgd.12297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li A, Cho JH, Reid B, Tseng CC, He L, Tan P, Yeh C-Y, Wu P, Li Y, Widelitz RB, et al. Calcium oscillations coordinate feather mesenchymal cell movement by shh dependent modulation of gap junction networks. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1). 018-07661. 5377. doi. 10.1038/s41467-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nakase T, Naus CC.. Gap junctions and neurological disorders of the central nervous system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1662(1–2):149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Totland MZ, Rasmussen NL, Knudsen LM. Leithe, E. Regulation of gap junction intercellular communication by connexin ubiquitination: physiological and pathophysiological implications. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(4):573–591. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03285-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Brink P, Barr L. Advances in organ biology. Vol. 8, Berkeley, CA: Elsevier; 2000. p. 397–423. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leithe E. Regulation of connexins by the ubiquitin system: implications for intercellular communication and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;2:133–146. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2016.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Simon AM, Goodenough DA. Diverse functions of vertebrate gap junctions. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8(12):477–483. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(98)01372-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Söhl G, Maxeiner S, Willecke K. Expression and functions of neuronal gap junctions. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(3):191–200. doi: 10.1038/nrn1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rouach N, Avignone E, Même W, Koulakoff A, Venance L, Blomstrand F, Giaume C. Gap junctions and connexin expression in the normal and pathological central nervous system. Biol Cell. 2002;94(7–8):457–475. doi: 10.1016/s0248-4900(02)00016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bani-Yaghoub M, Underhill TM, Naus CC. Gap junction blockage interferes with neuronal and astroglial differentiation of mouse p19 embryonal carcinoma cells. Dev Genet. 1999b;24(1–2):69–81. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bittman K, Owens DF, Kriegstein AR, LoTurco JJ. Cell coupling and uncoupling in the ventricular zone of developing neocortex. J Neurosci. 1997;17(18):7037–7044. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-18-07037.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nadarajah B, Jones AM, Evans WH, Parnavelas JG. Differential expression of connexins during neocortical development and neuronal circuit formation. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1997b;17(9):3096. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.17-09-03096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dermietzel R, Gao Y, Scemes E, Vieira D, Urban M, Kremer M, Bennett MVL, Spray DC. Connexin43 null mice reveal that astrocytes express multiple connexins. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;32(1):45–56. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00067-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Altevogt BM, Kleopa KA, Postma FR, Scherer SS, Paul DL. Connexin29 is uniquely distributed within myelinating glial cells of the central and peripheral nervous systems. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2002;22(15):6458. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.22-15-06458.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nagy JI, Patel D, Ochalski PA, Stelmack GL. Connexin30 in rodent, cat and human brain: selective expression in gray matter astrocytes, co-localization with connexin43 at gap junctions and late developmental appearance. Neuroscience. 1999;88(2):447–468. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00191-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nagy JI, Rash JE. Connexins and gap junctions of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the cns. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;32(1):29–44. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00066-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fushiki S, Perez Velazquez JL, Zhang L, Bechberger JF, Carlen PL, Naus CC. Changes in neuronal migration in neocortex of connexin43 null mutant mice. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62(3):304–314. doi: 10.1093/jnen/62.3.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Belliveau DJ, Naus CC. Cortical type 2 astrocytes are not dye coupled nor do they express the major gap junction genes found in the central nervous system. Glia. 1994;12(1):24–34. doi: 10.1002/glia.440120104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Belliveau DJ, Naus CC. Cellular localization of gap junction mrnas in developing rat brain. Dev Neurosci. 1995;17(2):81–96. doi: 10.1159/000111277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dermietzel R, Traub O, Hwang TK, Beyer E, Bennett MV, Spray DC, Willecke K. Differential expression of three gap junction proteins in developing and mature brain tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(24):10148–10152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.10148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Giaume C, Venance L. Gap junctions in brain glial cells and development. Perspect Dev Neurobiol. 1995;2:335–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Micevych PE, Abelson L. Distribution of mrnas coding for liver and heart gap junction proteins in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 1991;305(1):96–118. doi: 10.1002/cne.903050110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Spray DC, Dermietzel R. X-linked dominant charcot-marie-tooth disease and other potential gap-junction diseases of the nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:256–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Belluardo N, Mudò G, Trovato-Salinaro A, Le Gurun S, Charollais A, Serre-Beinier V, Amato G, Haefliger J-A, Meda P, Condorelli DF. Expression of connexin36 in the adult and developing rat brain. Brain Res. 2000;865(1):121–138. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02300-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rash JE, Yasumura T, Dudek FE, Nagy JI. Cell-specific expression of connexins and evidence of restricted gap junctional coupling between glial cells and between neurons. J Neurosci. 2001b;21(6):1983–2000. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-06-01983.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Söhl G, Degen J, Teubner B, Willecke K. The murine gap junction gene connexin36 is highly expressed in mouse retina and regulated during brain development. FEBS Lett. 1998;428(1):27–31. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00479-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Parenti R, Campisi A, Vanella A, Cicirata F. Immunocytochemical and rt-pcr analysis of connexin36 in cultures of mammalian glial cells. Arch Ital Biol. 2002;140:101–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chang Q, Gonzalez M, Pinter MJ, Balice-Gordon RJ. Gap junctional coupling and patterns of connexin expression among neonatal rat lumbar spinal motor neurons. J Neurosci. 1999;19(24):10813–10828. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-24-10813.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chávez CE, Oyarzún JE, Avendaño BC, Mellado LA, Inostroza CA, Alvear TF, Orellana JA. The opening of connexin 43 hemichannels alters hippocampal astrocyte function and neuronal survival in prenatally lps-exposed adult offspring. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13(460). doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Che W, Guo Y, Yang W, Zheng P, Zeng J, Tong W. Involvement of autophagy in connexin 40 reduction in the late phase of traumatic brain injury in rats. Brain Res Bull. 2017;131:100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dermietzel R, Hertberg EL, Kessler JA, Spray DC. Gap junctions between cultured astrocytes: immunocytochemical, molecular, and electrophysiological analysis. J Neurosci. 1991;11(5):1421–1432. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-05-01421.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Giaume C, Fromaget C, A. EA, Cordier J, Glowinski J, Gros D. Gap junctions in cultured astrocytes: single-channel currents and characterization of channel-forming protein. Neuron. 1991;6(1):133–143. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90128-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Eugenín EA, Eckardt D, Theis M, Willecke K, Bennett MV, Saez JC. Microglia at brain stab wounds express connexin 43 and in vitro form functional gap junctions after treatment with interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(7):4190–4195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051634298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martínez AD, Eugenín EA, Brañes MC, Bennett MV, Sáez JC. Identification of second messengers that induce expression of functional gap junctions in microglia cultured from newborn rats. Brain Res. 2002;943(2):191–201. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)02621-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Krüger O, Plum A, Kim JS, Winterhager E, Maxeiner S, Hallas G, Kirchhoff S, Traub O, Lamers WH, Willecke K. Defective vascular development in connexin 45-deficient mice. Development. 2000;127(19):4179–4193. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.19.4179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Maxeiner S, Krüger O, Schilling K, Traub O, Urschel S, Willecke K. Spatiotemporal transcription of connexin45 during brain development results in neuronal expression in adult mice. Neuroscience. 2003;119(3):689–700. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00077-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Teubner B, Odermatt B, Guldenagel M, Sohl G, Degen J, Bukauskas F, Kronengold J, Verselis VK, Jung YT, Kozak CA. Functional expression of the new gap junction gene connexin47 transcribed in mouse brain and spinal cord neurons. J Neurosci. 2001;21(4):1117–1126. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-04-01117.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Odermatt B, Wellershaus K, Wallraff A, Seifert G, Degen J, Euwens C, Fuss B, Büssow H, Schilling K, Steinhäuser C. Connexin 47 (cx47)-deficient mice with enhanced green fluorescent protein reporter gene reveal predominant oligodendrocytic expression of cx47 and display vacuolized myelin in the cns. J Neurosci. 2003;23(11):4549–4559. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-11-04549.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Orellana JA, Sáez PJ, Shoji KF, Schalper KA, Palacios-Prado N, Velarde V, Giaume C, Bennett MVL, Sáez JC. Modulation of brain hemichannels and gap junction channels by pro-inflammatory agents and their possible role in neurodegeneration. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11(2):369–399. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schock SC, Leblanc D, Hakim AM, Thompson CS. ATP release by way of connexin 36 hemichannels mediates ischemic tolerance in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;368(1):138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.01.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cotrina ML, Lin JH, Nedergaard M. Adhesive properties of connexin hemichannels. Glia. 2008;56(16):1791–1798. doi: 10.1002/glia.20728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yeung AK, Patil CS, Jackson MF. Pannexin-1 in the cns: emerging concepts in health and disease. J Neurochem. 2020;154(5):468–485. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bruzzone R, Hormuzdi SG, Barbe MT, Herb A Monyer H. Pannexins, a family of gap junction proteins expressed in brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(23):13644–13649. 10.1073/pnas.2233464100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 44.Penuela S, Gehi R, Laird DW. The biochemistry and function of pannexin channels. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 2013;1828(1):15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vicario N, Zappalà A, Calabrese G, Gulino R, Parenti C, Gulisano M, Parenti R. Connexins in the central nervous system: physiological traits and neuroprotective targets. Front Physiol. 2017;8(1060). doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bell CL, Murray SA. Adrenocortical Gap Junctions and Their Functions. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2016;7:82. 10.3389/fendo.2016.00082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Zorina Y, Iyengar R, Bromberg KD. Handbook of cell signaling (second edition). Bradshaw RA, Dennis EA, editors. San Diego: Academic Press; 2010. p. 1655–1663. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Olynik BM Rastegar M. The genetic and epigenetic journey of embryonic stem cells into mature neural cells. Front Genet. 2012;3: 81. 10.3389/fgene.2012.00081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Konstantinides N, Desplan C. Neuronal differentiation strategies: insights from single-cell sequencing and machine learning. Development. 2020;147(23):dev193631. doi: 10.1242/dev.193631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cai C, Grabel L. Directing the differentiation of embryonic stem cells to neural stem cells. Dev Dyn. 2007;236(12):3255–3266. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Carpenter MK, Inokuma MS, Denham J, Mujtaba T, Chiu CP, Rao MS. Enrichment of neurons and neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Exp Neurol. 2001;172(2):383–397. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dhara SK, Stice SL. Neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105(3):633–640. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Du ZW, Zhang SC. Neural differentiation from embryonic stem cells: which way?. Stem Cells Dev. 2004;13(4):372–381. doi: 10.1089/scd.2004.13.372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hong S, Kang UJ, Isacson O, Kim KS. Neural precursors derived from human embryonic stem cells maintain long-term proliferation without losing the potential to differentiate into all three neural lineages, including dopaminergic neurons. J Neurochem. 2008;104(2):316–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04952.x. Epub 2007 Oct 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Keirstead HS, Nistor G, Bernal G, Totoiu M, Cloutier F, Sharp K, Steward O. Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cell transplants remyelinate and restore locomotion after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2005;25(19):4694–4705. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0311-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Robertson MJ, Gip P, Schaffer DV, Gip P, Schaffer DV, Schaffer DV, Gip P, Schaffer DV, Schaffer DV, Schaffer DV. Neural stem cell engineering: directed differentiation of adult and embryonic stem cells into neurons. Front Biosci. 2008;13(13):21–50. doi: 10.2741/2558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shin S, Mitalipova M, Noggle S, Tibbitts D, Venable A, Rao R, Stice SL. Long-term proliferation of human embryonic stem cell-derived neuroepithelial cells using defined adherent culture conditions. Stem Cells. 2006;24(1):125–138. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wilson PG, Stice SS. Development and differentiation of neural rosettes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2006;2(1):67–77. doi: 10.1007/s12015-006-0011-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.O’Rahilly R, Müller F. Neurulation in the normal human embryo. Ciba Found Symp. 1994;181:70–82. doi: 10.1002/9780470514559.ch5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dhara SK, Hasneen K, Machacek DW, Boyd NL, Rao RR, Stice SL. Human neural progenitor cells derived from embryonic stem cells in feeder-free cultures. Differentiation. 2008;76(5):454–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2007.00256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Reubinoff BE, Itsykson P, Turetsky T, Pera MF, Reinhartz E, Itzik A, Ben-Hur T. Neural progenitors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(12):1134–1140. doi: 10.1038/nbt1201-1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang SC, Wernig M, Duncan ID, Brüstle O, Thomson JA. In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(12):1129–1133. doi: 10.1038/nbt1201-1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Maden M. Retinoic acid in the development, regeneration and maintenance of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(10):755–765. doi: 10.1038/nrn2212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Baharvand H, Mehrjardi NZ, Hatami M, Kiani S, Rao M, Haghighi MM. Neural differentiation from human embryonic stem cells in a defined adherent culture condition. Int J Dev Biol. 2007;51(5):371–378. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.72280hb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Erceg S, Laínez S, Ronaghi M, Stojkovic P, Pérez-Aragó MA, Moreno-Manzano V, Moreno-Palanques R, Planells-Cases R, Stojkovic M. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to regional specific neural precursors in chemically defined medium conditions. PLoS One. 2008;3(5):e2122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0002122. e2122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Levenberg S, Huang NF, Lavik E, Rogers AB, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Langer R. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells on three-dimensional polymer scaffolds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(22):12741–12746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1735463100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Park S, Lee KS, Lee YJ, Shin HA, Cho HY, Wang KC, Kim YS, Lee HT, Chung KS, Kim EY. Generation of dopaminergic neurons in vitro from human embryonic stem cells treated with neurotrophic factors. Neurosci Lett. 2004;359(1–2):99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.01.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Schuldiner M, Eiges R, Eden A, Yanuka O, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Goldstein RS, Benvenisty N. Induced neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Brain Res. 2001;913(2):201–205. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02776-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gerrard L, Rodgers L, Cui W. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to neural lineages in adherent culture by blocking bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Stem Cells. 2005;23(9):1234–1241. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pera MF, Andrade J, Houssami S, Reubinoff B, Trounson A, Stanley EG, Oostwaard DWV, Mummery C. Regulation of human embryonic stem cell differentiation by bmp-2 and its antagonist noggin. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(7):1269–1280. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Itsykson P, Ilouz N, Turetsky T, Goldstein RS, Pera MF, Fishbein I, Segal M, Reubinoff BE. Derivation of neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells in the presence of noggin. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005;30(1):24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Belousov AB, Fontes JD. Neuronal gap junctions: making and breaking connections during development and injury. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36(4):227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dere E, Zheng-Fischhöfer Q, Viggiano D, Gironi Carnevale UA, Ruocco LA, Zlomuzica A, Schnichels M, Willecke K, Huston JP, Sadile AG. Connexin31.1 deficiency in the mouse impairs object memory and modulates open-field exploration, acetylcholine esterase levels in the striatum, and camp response element-binding protein levels in the striatum and piriform cortex. Neuroscience. 2008;153(2):396–405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kreuzberg MM, Deuchars J, Weiss E, Schober A, Sonntag S, Wellershaus K, Draguhn A, Willecke K. Expression of connexin30.2 in interneurons of the central nervous system in the mouse. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008;37(1):119–134. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Li X, Kamasawa N, Ciolofan C, Olson CO, Lu S, Davidson KG, Yasumura T, Shigemoto R, Rash JE, Nagy JI. Connexin45-containing neuronal gap junctions in rodent retina also contain connexin36 in both apposing hemiplaques, forming bihomotypic gap junctions, with scaffolding contributed by zonula occludens-1. J Neurosci. 2008;28(39):9769–9789. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2137-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Personius KE, Chang Q, Mentis GZ, O’Donovan MJ, Balice-Gordon RJ. Reduced gap junctional coupling leads to uncorrelated motor neuron firing and precocious neuromuscular synapse elimination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(28):11808–11813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703357104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Puller C, de Sevilla Müller LP, Janssen-Bienhold U, Haverkamp S. Zo-1 and the spatial organization of gap junctions and glutamate receptors in the outer plexiform layer of the mammalian retina. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2009;29(19):6266–6275. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.5867-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rash JE, Kamasawa N, Davidson KGV, Yasumura T, Pereda AE, Nagy JI. Connexin composition in apposed gap junction hemiplaques revealed by matched double-replica freeze-fracture replica immunogold labeling. J Membr Biol. 2012;245(5–6):333–344. doi: 10.1007/s00232-012-9454-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Venance L, Rozov A, Blatow M, Burnashev N, Feldmeyer D, Monyer H. Connexin expression in electrically coupled postnatal rat brain neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(18):10260–10265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160037097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gabriel H-D, Jung D, Bützler C, Temme A, Traub O, Winterhager E, Willecke K. Transplacental uptake of glucose is decreased in embryonic lethal connexin26-deficient mice. J Cell Biol. 1998;140(6):1453–1461. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.6.1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Cohen-Salmon M, Ott T, Michel V, Hardelin JP, Perfettini I, Eybalin M, Wu T, Marcus DC, Wangemann P, Willecke K. Targeted ablation of connexin26 in the inner ear epithelial gap junction network causes hearing impairment and cell death. Current Biology: CB. 2002;12(13):1106–1111. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00904-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Teubner B, Michel V, Pesch J, Lautermann J, Cohen-Salmon M, Söhl G. Connexin30 (gjb6)-deficiency causes severe hearing impairment and lack of endocochlear potential. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(1):13–21. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Anzini P, Neuberg DH, Schachner M, Nelles E, Willecke K, Zielasek J, Toyka KV, Suter U, Martini R. Structural abnormalities and deficient maintenance of peripheral nerve myelin in mice lacking the gap junction protein connexin 32. J Neurosci. 1997;17(12):4545–4551. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-12-04545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Scherer SS, Xu YT, Nelles E, Fischbeck K, Willecke K, Bone LJ. Connexin32-null mice develop demyelinating peripheral neuropathy. Glia. 1998;24(1):8–20. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sutor B, Schmolke C, Teubner B, Schirmer C, Willecke K. Myelination defects and neuronal hyperexcitability in the neocortex of connexin 32-deficient mice. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10(7):684–697. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.7.684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Oguro K, Jover T, Tanaka H, Lin Y, Kojima T, Oguro N, Grooms SY, Bennett MVL, Zukin RS. Global ischemia-induced increases in the gap junctional proteins connexin 32 (cx32) and cx36 in hippocampus and enhanced vulnerability of cx32 knock-out mice. J Neurosci. 2001;21(19):7534–7542. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-19-07534.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Güldenagel M, Ammermüller J, Feigenspan A, Teubner B, Degen J, Söhl G, Willecke K, Weiler R. Visual transmission deficits in mice with targeted disruption of the gap junction gene connexin36. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;21(16):6036. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.21-16-06036.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Buhl DL, Harris KD, Hormuzdi SG, Monyer H, Buzsáki G. Selective impairment of hippocampal gamma oscillations in connexin-36 knock-out mouse <em>in vivo</em&gt. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2003;23(3):1013. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.23-03-01013.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Deans MR, Gibson JR, Sellitto C, Connors BW, Paul DL. Synchronous activity of inhibitory networks in neocortex requires electrical synapses containing connexin36. Neuron. 2001;31(3):477–485. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00373-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Hormuzdi SG, Pais I, LeBeau FE, Towers SK, Rozov A, Buhl EH, Whittington MA, Monyer H. Impaired electrical signaling disrupts gamma frequency oscillations in connexin 36-deficient mice. Neuron. 2001;31(3):487–495. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00387-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Asteriti S, Gargini C, Cangiano L. Connexin 36 expression is required for electrical coupling between mouse rods and cones. Vis Neurosci. 2017;34:E006. doi: 10.1017/S0952523817000037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.He J-T, Li X-Y, Yang L, Zhao X. Astroglial connexins and cognition: memory formation or deterioration?. Biosci Rep. 2020;40(1). doi: 10.1042/bsr20193510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Reaume AG, de Sousa PA, Kulkarni S, Langille BL, Zhu D, Davies TC, Juneja S, Kidder G, Rossant J. Cardiac malformation in neonatal mice lacking connexin43. Science. 1995;267(5205):1831–1834. doi: 10.1126/science.7892609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Naus CC, Bani-Yaghoub M. Gap junctional communication in the developing central nervous system. Cell Biol Int. 1998;22(11–12):751–763. doi: 10.1006/cbir.1998.0391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Li X, Zuo X, Jing J, Ma Y, Wang J, Liu D, Zhu J, Du X, Xiong L, Du Y. Small-molecule-driven direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts into functional neurons. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17(2):195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lo CW, Waldo KL, Kirby ML. Gap junction communication and the modulation of cardiac neural crest cells. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 1999;9(3–4):63–69. doi: 10.1016/s1050-1738(99)00015-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Nakase T, Fushiki S, Naus CC. Astrocytic gap junctions composed of connexin 43 reduce apoptotic neuronal damage in cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2003;34(8):1987–1993. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000079814.72027.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Siushansian R, Bechberger JF, Cechetto DF, Hachinski VC, Naus CC. Connexin43 null mutation increases infarct size after stroke. J Comp Neurol. 2001;440(4):387–394. doi: 10.1002/cne.1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Menichella DM, Goodenough DA, Sirkowski E, Scherer SS, Paul DL. Connexins are critical for normal myelination in the cns. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2003;23(13):5963. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.23-13-05963.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Goodenough DA, Goliger JA, Paul DL. Connexins, connexons, and intercellular communication. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65(1):475–502. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.002355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Jiang JX, Gu S. Gap junction- and hemichannel-independent actions of connexins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;10(2):208–214. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Zhou JZ, Jiang JX. Gap junction and hemichannel-independent actions of connexins on cell and tissue functions–an update. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(8):1186–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Cherian PP, Siller-Jackson AJ, Gu S, Wang X, Bonewald LF, Sprague E, Jiang JX. Mechanical strain opens connexin 43 hemichannels in osteocytes: a novel mechanism for the release of prostaglandin. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16(7):3100–3106. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-10-0912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Spray DC, Ye ZC, Ransom BR. Functional connexin “hemichannels”: a critical appraisal. Glia. 2006;54(7):758–773. doi: 10.1002/glia.20429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bouskila Y, Dudek FE. Neuronal synchronization without calcium-dependent synaptic transmission in the hypothalamus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(8):3207–3210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Christie MJ, Williams JT, North RA. Electrical coupling synchronizes subthreshold activity in locus coeruleus neurons in vitro from neonatal rats. J Neurosci. 1989;9(10):3584–3589. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-10-03584.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Taylor CP, Dudek FE. A physiological test for electrotonic coupling between ca1 pyramidal cells in rat hippocampal slices. Brain Res. 1982;235(2):351–357. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)91013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Wong RO, Chernjavsky A, Smith SJ, Shatz CJ. Early functional neural networks in the developing retina. Nature. 1995;374(6524):716–718. doi: 10.1038/374716a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Connors BW, Benardo LS, Prince DA. Coupling between neurons of the developing rat neocortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1983;3(4):773. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.03-04-00773.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lo Turco JJ, Kriegstein AR. Clusters of coupled neuroblasts in embryonic neocortex. Science. 1991a;252(5005):563. doi: 10.1126/science.1850552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Peinado A, Yuste R, Katz LC. Extensive dye coupling between rat neocortical neurons during the period of circuit formation. Neuron. 1993a;10(1):103–114. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90246-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Yuste R, Peinado A, Katz LC. Neuronal domains in developing neocortex. Science. 1992;257(5070):665–669. doi: 10.1126/science.1496379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Peinado A, Yuste R, Katz LC. Gap junctional communication and the development of local circuits in neocortex. Cereb Cortex. 1993b;3(5):488–498. doi: 10.1093/cercor/3.5.488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Elias LA, Kriegstein AR. Gap junctions: multifaceted regulators of embryonic cortical development. Trends Neurosci. 2008;31(5):243–250. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2008.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zhang C, Restrepo D. Expression of connexin 45 in the olfactory system. Brain Res. 2002;929(1):37–47. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)03372-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kamermans M, Fahrenfort I, Schultz K, Janssen-Bienhold U, Sjoerdsma T, Weiler R. Hemichannel-mediated inhibition in the outer retina. Science. 2001;292(5519):1178–1180. doi: 10.1126/science.1060101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Feigenspan A, Teubner B, Willecke K, Weiler R. Expression of neuronal connexin36 in aii amacrine cells of the mammalian retina. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;21(1):230. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.21-01-00230.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Nagy JI, Li X, Rempel J, Stelmack G, Patel D, Staines WA, Yasumura T, Rash JE. Connexin26 in adult rodent central nervous system: demonstration at astrocytic gap junctions and colocalization with connexin30 and connexin43. J Comp Neurol. 2001;441(4):302–323. doi: 10.1002/cne.1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Xu X, Li WE, Huang GY, Meyer R, Chen T, Luo Y, Thomas MP, Radice GL, Lo CW. Modulation of mouse neural crest cell motility by n-cadherin and connexin 43 gap junctions. J Cell Biol. 2001;154(1):217–230. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200105047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Rash JE, Yasumura T, Davidson KG, Furman CS, Dudek FE, Nagy JI. Identification of cells expressing cx43, cx30, cx26, cx32 and cx36 in gap junctions of rat brain and spinal cord. Cell Commun Adhes. 2001a;8(4–6):315–320. doi: 10.3109/15419060109080745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Melanson-Drapeau L, Beyko S, Davé S, Hebb ALO, Franks DJ, Sellitto C, Paul DL, Bennett SAL. Oligodendrocyte progenitor enrichment in the connexin32 null-mutant mouse. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2003;23(5):1759–1768. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.23-05-01759.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Bani-Yaghoub M, Bechberger JF, Naus CCG. Reduction of connexin43 expression and dye-coupling during neuronal differentiation of human ntera2/clone d1 cells. J Neurosci Res. 1997;49(1):19–31. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Bani-Yaghoub M, Bechberger JF, Underhill TM, Naus CC. The effects of gap junction blockage on neuronal differentiation of human ntera2/clone d1 cells. Exp Neurol. 1999a;156(1):16–32. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1998.6950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Boucher S, Bennett SAL. Differential connexin expression, gap junction intercellular coupling, and hemichannel formation in nt2/d1 human neural progenitors and terminally differentiated hnt neurons. J Neurosci Res. 2003;72(3):393–404. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Kandler K, Katz LC. Coordination of neuronal activity in developing visual cortex by gap junction-mediated biochemical communication. J Neurosci. 1998;18(4):1419–1427. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-04-01419.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Belousov AB, Fontes JD, Freitas-Andrade M, Naus CC. Gap junctions and hemichannels: communicating cell death in neurodevelopment and disease. BMC Cell Biol. 2017;18(Suppl 1):016–0120. doi: 10.1186/s12860-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Decrock E, De Bock M, Wang N, Bultynck G, Giaume C, Naus CC, Green CR, Leybaert L.. Connexin and pannexin signaling pathways, an architectural blueprint for cns physiology and pathology?. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(15):2823–2851. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-1962-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bruzzone R, White TW, Paul DL. Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem. 1996;238(1):1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0001q.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Davies TC, Barr KJ, Jones DH, Zhu D, Kidder GM. Multiple members of the connexin gene family participate in preimplantation development of the mouse. Dev Genet. 1996;18(3):234–243. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Charvériat M, Naus CC, Leybaert L, Sáez JC, Giaume C. Connexin-dependent neuroglial networking as a new therapeutic target. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11(174). doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Liu Z, Xu D, Wang S, Chen Y, Li Z, Gao X, Jiang L, Tang Y, Peng Y. Astrocytes induce proliferation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells via connexin 47-mediated activation of the erk/id4 pathway. Cell Cycle. 2017;16(7):714–722. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1295183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Burkovetskaya M, Karpuk N, Xiong J, Bosch M, Boska MD, Takeuchi H, Suzumura A, Kielian T. Evidence for aberrant astrocyte hemichannel activity in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (jncl). PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Orellana JA, Hernández DE, Ezan P, Velarde V, Bennett MV, Giaume C, Sáez JC. Hypoxia in high glucose followed by reoxygenation in normal glucose reduces the viability of cortical astrocytes through increased permeability of connexin 43 hemichannels. Glia. 2010;58(3):329–343. doi: 10.1002/glia.20926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Retamal MA, Froger N, Palacios-Prado N, Ezan P, Sáez PJ, Sáez JC, Giaume C. Cx43 hemichannels and gap junction channels in astrocytes are regulated oppositely by proinflammatory cytokines released from activated microglia. J Neurosci. 2007;27(50):13781–13792. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2042-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Akopian A, Atlasz T, Pan F, Wong S, Zhang Y, Völgyi B, Paul DL, Bloomfield SA.. Gap junction-mediated death of retinal neurons is connexin and insult specific: a potential target for neuroprotection. J Neurosci. 2014;34(32):10582–10591. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1912-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.O’Carroll SJ, Gorrie CA, Velamoor S, Green CR, Nicholson LF. Connexin43 mimetic peptide is neuroprotective and improves function following spinal cord injury. Neurosci Res. 2013;75(3):256–267. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2013.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Chen W, Guo Y, Yang W, Zheng P, Zeng J, Tong W. Involvement of connexin40 in the protective effects of ginsenoside rb1 against traumatic brain injury. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2016;36(7):1057–1065. doi: 10.1007/s10571-015-0299-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Davidson JO, Rout AL, Wassink G, Yuill CA, Zhang FG, Green CR, Bennet L, Gunn AJ. Non-additive effects of delayed connexin hemichannel blockade and hypothermia after cerebral ischemia in near-term fetal sheep. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35(12):2052–2061. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Nakase T, Maeda T, Yoshida Y, Nagata K. Ischemia alters the expression of connexins in the aged human brain. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009;147946(10):23. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000079814.72027.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Orellana JA, Avendaño BC, Montero TD. Role of connexins and pannexins in ischemic stroke. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21(19):2165–2182. doi: 10.2174/0929867321666131228191714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Nagy JI. Evidence for connexin36 localization at hippocampal mossy fiber terminals suggesting mixed chemical/electrical transmission by granule cells. Brain Res. 2012;3:107–122. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Orellana JA, Shoji KF, Abudara V, Ezan P, Amigou E, Sáez PJ, Jiang JX, Naus CC, Sáez JC, Giaume C. Amyloid β-induced death in neurons involves glial and neuronal hemichannels. J Neurosci. 2011. Mar 30;31(13):4962–77. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6417-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Almad AA, Doreswamy A, Gross SK, Richard JP, Huo Y, Haughey N, Maragakis NJ. Connexin 43 in astrocytes contributes to motor neuron toxicity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Glia. 2016;64(7):1154–1169. doi: 10.1002/glia.22989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Salmina AB, Morgun AV, Kuvacheva NV, Lopatina OL, Komleva YK, Malinovskaya NA, Pozhilenkova EA. Establishment of neurogenic microenvironment in the neurovascular unit: the connexin 43 story. Rev Neurosci. 2014;25(1):97–111. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2013-0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Chew SS, Johnson CS, Green CR, Danesh-Meyer HV. Role of connexin43 in central nervous system injury. Exp Neurol. 2010. Oct;225(2):250–61. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Wang, Z., Huang, J. Neuregulin-1 Increases Connexin-40 and Connexin-45 Expression in Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014;174:483–493. doi: 10.1007/s12010-014-1089-6 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 147.Wang Y, Song JH, Denisova JV, Park WM, Fontes JD, Belousov AB. Neuronal gap junction coupling is regulated by glutamate and plays critical role in cell death during neuronal injury. J Neurosci. 2012;32(2):713–725. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3872-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Wang Y, Denisova JV, Kang KS, Fontes JD, Zhu BT, Belousov AB. Neuronal gap junctions are required for nmda receptor-mediated excitotoxicity: implications in ischemic stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104(6):3551–3556. doi: 10.1152/jn.00656.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Decrock E, Vinken M, De Vuyst E, Krysko DV, D’Herde K, Vanhaecke T, Vandenabeele P, Rogiers V, Leybaert L. Connexin-related signaling in cell death: to live or let die?. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16(4):524–536. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Jin MM, Chen Z. Role of gap junctions in epilepsy. Neurosci Bull. 2011;27(6):389–406. doi: 10.1007/s12264-011-1944-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Manjarrez-Marmolejo J, Franco-Pérez J. Gap junction blockers: an overview of their effects on induced seizures in animal models. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14(7):759–771. doi: 10.2174/1570159x14666160603115942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Mylvaganam S, Ramani M, Krawczyk M, Carlen PL. Roles of gap junctions, connexins, and pannexins in epilepsy. Front Physiol. 2014;5(172). doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Hartfield EM, Rinaldi F, Glover CP, Wong LF, Caldwell MA, Uney JB, Leipzig ND. Connexin 36 expression regulates neuronal differentiation from neural progenitor cells. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e14746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. e14746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Cina C, Bechberger JF, Ozog MA, Naus CC. Expression of connexins in embryonic mouse neocortical development. J Comp Neurol. 2007;504(3):298–313. doi: 10.1002/cne.21426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Hanganu IL, Okabe A, Lessmann V, Luhmann HJ. Cellular mechanisms of subplate-driven and cholinergic input-dependent network activity in the neonatal rat somatosensory cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(1):89–105. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Maher BJ, McGinley MJ, Westbrook GL. Experience-dependent maturation of the glomerular microcircuit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 29;106(39):16865–16870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808946106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Ben-Ari Y. Developing networks play a similar melody. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24(6):353–360. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01813-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Strata F, Atzori M, Molnar M, Ugolini G, Tempia F, Cherubini E. A pacemaker current in dye-coupled hilar interneurons contributes to the generation of giant gabaergic potentials in developing hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1997;17(4):1435–1446. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-04-01435.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Swayne LA, Bennett SAL. Connexins and pannexins in neuronal development and adult neurogenesis. BMC Cell Biology. 2016;17(Suppl 1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12860-016-0089-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Bruzzone R, Dermietzel R. Structure and function of gap junctions in the developing brain. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;326(2):239–248. doi: 10.1007/s00441-006-0287-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Lo Turco JJ, Kriegstein AR. Clusters of coupled neuroblasts in embryonic neocortex. Science. 1991b;252(5005):563–566. doi: 10.1126/science.1850552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Weissman TA, Riquelme PA, Ivic L, Flint AC, Kriegstein AR. Calcium waves propagate through radial glial cells and modulate proliferation in the developing neocortex. Neuron. 2004;43(5):647–661. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Bittman KS, LoTurco JJ. Differential regulation of connexin 26 and 43 in murine neocortical precursors. Cereb Cortex. 1999a;9(2):188–195. doi: 10.1093/cercor/9.2.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Rakic P. Guidance of neurons migrating to the fetal monkey neocortex. Brain Res. 1971;33(2):471–476. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90119-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Rakic P. Mode of cell migration to the superficial layers of fetal monkey neocortex. J Comp Neurol. 1972;145(1):61–83. doi: 10.1002/cne.901450105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Elias LA, Wang DD, Kriegstein AR. Gap junction adhesion is necessary for radial migration in the neocortex. Nature. 2007;448(7156):901–907. doi: 10.1038/nature06063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Nadarajah B, Jones AM, Evans WH, Parnavelas JG. Differential expression of connexins during neocortical development and neuronal circuit formation. J Neurosci. 1997a;17(9):3096–3111. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-09-03096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Wiencken-Barger AE, Djukic B, Casper KB, McCarthy KD. A role for connexin43 during neurodevelopment. Glia. 2007;55(7):675–686. doi: 10.1002/glia.20484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Rozental R, Morales M, Mehler MF, Urban M, Kremer M, Dermietzel R, Kessler JA, Spray DC. Changes in the properties of gap junctions during neuronal differentiation of hippocampal progenitor cells. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1998;18(5):1753–1762. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.18-05-01753.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Hellmann P, Winterhager E, Spray DC. Properties of connexin40 gap junction channels endogenously expressed and exogenously overexpressed in human choriocarcinoma cell lines. Pflugers Arch. 1996;432(3):501–509. doi: 10.1007/s004240050162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Reed KE, Westphale EM, Larson DM, Wang HZ, Veenstra RD, Beyer EC. Molecular cloning and functional expression of human connexin37, an endothelial cell gap junction protein. J Clin Invest. 1993;91(3):997–1004. doi: 10.1172/JCI116321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Leung DS, Unsicker K, Reuss B. Expression and developmental regulation of gap junction connexins cx26, cx32, cx43 and cx45 in the rat midbrain-floor. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2002;20(1):63–75. doi: 10.1016/s0736-5748(01)00056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Unsworth HC, Aasen T, McElwaine S, Kelsell DP. Tissue-specific effects of wild-type and mutant connexin 31: a role in neurite outgrowth. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16(2):165–172. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Cheng A, Tang H, Cai J, Zhu M, Zhang X, Rao M, Mattson MP. Gap junctional communication is required to maintain mouse cortical neural progenitor cells in a proliferative state. Dev Biol. 2004;272(1):203–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Selman K, Kafatos FC. Transdifferentiation in the labial gland of silk moths: is DNA required for cellular metamorphosis?. Cell Differ. 1974;3(2):81–94. doi: 10.1016/0045-6039(74)90030-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Tang Y, Yu P, Cheng L. Current progress in the derivation and therapeutic application of neural stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(10):e3108–e3108. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Dilger N, Neehus AL, Grieger K, Hoffmann A, Menssen M, Ngezahayo A. Gap junction dependent cell communication is modulated during transdifferentiation of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells towards neuron-like cells. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:869. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Wan XY, Xu LY, Li B, Sun QH, Ji QL, Huang DD, Zhao L, Xiao YT. Chemical conversion of human lung fibroblasts into neuronal cells. Int J Mol Med. 2018;41(3):1463–1468. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Zhang M, Lin YH, Sun YJ, Zhu S, Zheng J, Liu K, Cao N, Li K, Huang Y, Ding S. Pharmacological reprogramming of fibroblasts into neural stem cells by signaling-directed transcriptional activation. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18(5):653–667. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Tonkin RS, Mao Y, O’Carroll SJ, Nicholson LF, Green CR, Gorrie CA, Moalem-Taylor G. Gap junction proteins and their role in spinal cord injury. Front Mol Neurosci. 2015;7(102). doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00102. eCollection 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Li T, Niu J, Yu G, Ezan P, Yi C, Wang X, Koulakoff A, Gao X, Chen X, Sáez JC. Connexin 43 deletion in astrocytes promotes cns remyelination by modulating local inflammation. Glia. 2020;68(6):1201–1212. doi: 10.1002/glia.23770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Jäderstad J, Jäderstad LM, Li J, Chintawar S, Salto C, Pandolfo M, Ourednik V, Teng YD, Sidman RL, Arenas E. Communication via gap junctions underlies early functional and beneficial interactions between grafted neural stem cells and the host. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(11):5184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915134107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Fabbiani G, Reali C, Valentin-Kahan A, Rehermann MI, Fagetti J, Falco MV, Russo RE. Connexin signaling is involved in the reactivation of a latent stem cell niche after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2020;40(11):2246–2258. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2056-19.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Roerig B, Feller MB. Neurotransmitters and gap junctions in developing neural circuits. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;32(1):86–114. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00069-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tissue Barriers are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES