Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 14;8:800889. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.800889

Table 3.

Comparison of platforms based on different nanomaterials for detection of urinary EVs.

Samples Isolation method Detection method Sample volume (μL) Identified molecules Time cost Limit of detection Retrieval of EVs cargo Reference
Urine Nanofilters (600: 20 nm) On-disc ELISA 1,000 CD81/CD9 <30 min N/A Elution (65)
Urine IAF capture Immunofluorescence 1,000 CD81/CD63/CD9 87 min (isolation + detection) N/A Magnet release (75)
Urine IAF capture Molecular beacon 10,000 PSMA 2 h (isolation + detection) 100 particles/μL Magnet release and restriction enzyme (76)
Urine IAF capture Immunofluorescence 500 CD81/CD63/CD9
/EpCAM
N/A N/A Magnet release (82)
Urine IAF capture NP-TRFIA 200 Tetraspanin
and glycan
N/A 0.03–0.06 ng/mL Magnet release (83)
Urine IAF capture On-chip ELISA 8,000 CD63 200 min (isolation + detection) 35.0 arbitrary unit/mL N/A (71)
Urine Electrostatic effect produced by nanowires In situ lysis of EVs and extraction of EV-encapsulated miRNAs 1,000 miRNAs N/A N/A In situ lysis and extraction (70)
Urine Hydrophilic enrichment Mass spectrometry (MS) 200 N-glycopeptides 1 h N/A Elution (81)

EVs, extracellular vesicles; Ref, reference; ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; N/A, not available; IAF, immunoaffinity; PSMA, prostate-specific membrane antigen; NP-TRFIA, Eu3+-doped nanoparticles with time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay; MS, mass spectrometry.