Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 18;119(4):e2115651119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115651119

Table 2.

Relevant results from the MSL QMS during EGA and informal stratigraphic units for samples

Label BSW (nmol) Reduced S PP* (%) SO2 δ34S† (‰) ±1 SE Stratigraphy
CB1 3 >99 −21 36 Sheepbed, Bradbury group
CB2 1.8 89 −28 14
CB3 1.3 89 −47 14
CB5 0.2 84 −40 10
CB6 0.1 ND ND ND
TP 0.2 <1 6 7 Pahrump Hills‡
BS1 0.4 78 3 6 Stimson formation
GH1 0.2 <1, 60 28 7
GB2 0.1 86, 57 ND ND Bagnold dunes
OU1 0.6 16 −31 9 Hartmann's‡
MB 0.2 74 ND ND Karasburg‡
DU 31.2 2 ND ND Blunts Point‡
ST 2.9 4 ND ND Pettegrove Point‡
HF 3.5 93 ND ND Jura‡ (including VRR for HF and RH)
RH 0.3 93 −18 40
KM 0.4 97 −21 19
GE1 0.6 7 20 4 Knockfarril Hill§
GE3 0.2 9 −14 5
HU 12.7 11 18 6 GG§
EB 5 73 −27 7 Stimson formation
GG 1.2 1 5 9 GG§
MA1 0.3 1 8 5 Knockfarril Hill§
BD 0.5 6 −9 6 Mercou§
PT 0.3 1 1 3 Pontours§

ND, not determined.

*

PP, posterior probability; Wong (5); Wong et al. (6).

Franz et al. (4); Wong (5).

Members of Murray formation.

§Members of Carolyn Shoemaker formation.