Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 14;15:799576. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.799576

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Cartoon depictions of a voxel containing three white matter crossing fibers (i.e., vertical, horizontal, and through-plane fibers) and the corresponding diffusion tensor and fractional anisotropy (FA). (A) On the left-hand side, FA = 0 because there is no dominant fiber direction (i.e., same diameter, density and integrity of fibers arranged orthogonally), where water diffusion will be constrained equally in all directions. On the right-hand side, the vertical fibers remain unchanged while the other two fiber bundles (i.e., horizontal and through-plane) are decreased, such that λ1 becomes larger than λ2 and λ3, resulting in an FA increase despite a net white matter fiber reduction. (B) On the left-hand side, there is a principle fiber orientation (i.e., in the vertical direction) and a corresponding FA > 0. On the right-hand side, all three fibers experience the same amount of tissue damage, such that all three eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, and λ3) are increased proportionally, resulting in a constant (unchanged) FA despite a net decrease in white matter fiber density. Because it is a relative measure, FA cannot provide quantitative information about net tissue differences/changes in the presence of crossing fibers. Bold arrow represents a relatively large increase (λ1 in part A), thin arrows represent a relatively small increase (λ1 and λ2 in part A), and medium arrows indicate a moderate increase (λ1, λ2 and λ3 in part B).