Table 1.
Authors | Year | Country | Total, n | Genotype frequencies, n | P-valuea | Allele frequencies, n | P-valueb | HWE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MM | ML | LL | M | L | ||||||||
O'Rourke et al. (13) | 1999 | USA | CTL | 344 | 230 | 102 | 12 | 0.0312 | 562 | 126 | 0.0084 | 0.8677 |
CWD | 43 | 37 | 6 | 0 | 80 | 6 | 0.6229 | |||||
Perucchini et al. (16) | 2008 | USA | CTL | 248 | 162 | 80 | 6 | 0.6927 | 404 | 92 | 0.4294 | 0.2872 |
CWD | 94 | 66 | 26 | 2 | 158 | 30 | 0.7621 | |||||
In this study | 2021 | South Korea | CTL | 204 | 144 | 49 | 11 | 0.9326 | 337 | 71 | 0.8000 | 0.0188 |
CWD | 49 | 35 | 12 | 2 | 82 | 16 | 0.4681 |
The number of genotype frequencies in each column indicates the number of genotypes. The number reported in each “Allele frequencies” column indicates the number of alleles. The number “Total, n” indicates the number of animals. Bold text indicates statistically significant results (P < 0.05). CTL, matched healthy elks; CWD, CWD-affected elk; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; P-valuea: Based on the comparison of genotype frequencies between healthy controls and CWD-affected animals; P-valueb: Based on the comparison of allele frequencies between healthy controls and CWD-affected animals.