Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun;29(4):819–832. doi: 10.1177/09697330211066574

Table 2.

Degree of ethical conflict.

Scenario Area Not problematic Little problematic Somewhat problematic Moderately problematic Very problematic N
n % n % n % n % n %
S1 T&CP 1 1 23 22.1 39 37.5 33 31.7 8 7.7 104
S2 P&F 6 6.8 33 37.5 26 29.5 15 17.0 8 9.1 88
S3 DS&WE 13 13.5 44 45.8 18 18.8 19 19.8 2 2.1 96
S4 P&F 2 2.3 18 20.5 26 29.5 27 30.7 15 17.0 88
S5 P&F 5 7.6 8 12.1 17 25.8 22 33.3 14 21.2 66
S6 P&F 11 14.9 20 27.0 18 24.3 15 20.3 10 13.5 74
S7 T&CP 5 4.9 7 6.8 17 16.5 33 32.0 41 39.8 103
S8 DS&WE 10 9.6 17 16.3 21 20.2 44 42.3 12 11.5 104
S9 DS&WE 1 1.2 9 10.5 20 23.3 26 30.2 30 34.9 86
S10 P&F 1 1.4 6 8.3 12 16.7 22 30.6 31 43.1 72
S11 T&CP 4 4.4 6 6.7 16 17.8 36 40.0 28 31.1 90
S12 DS&WE 1 1.0 11 11.1 16 16.2 28 28.3 43 43.4 99
S13 DS&WE 1 1.4 12 16.7 14 19.4 22 30.6 23 31.9 72
S14 T&CP 1 1.5 15 22.7 20 30.3 14 21.2 16 24.2 66
S15 DS&WE 4 6.7 17 28.3 12 20.0 18 30.0 9 15.0 60
S16 P&F 5 6.8 14 19.2 15 20.5 19 26.0 20 27.4 73
S17 T&CP 11 12.0 23 25.0 27 29.3 21 22.8 10 10.9 92
S18 P&F 3 3.4 17 19.5 23 26.4 21 24.1 23 26.4 87
S19 DS&WE 5 6.7 15 20.0 18 24.0 21 28.0 16 21.3 75

Abbreviations: S = Situations, T&CP = Treatment and Clinical Procedures, P&F: Patient and family interpersonal relationships, DS&WE: Dynamics of the Service and Working Environment, n=number of respondents, N=total number of respondents in each situation.