TABLE 4.
Hierarchical regression analyses on work engagement and emotional exhaustion.
Work engagement |
Emotional exhaustion |
||||||||||||||
B | 95% CI for B |
SE B | β | Adj. R 2 | ΔR2 | B | 95% CI for B |
SE B | β | Adj. R 2 | ΔR2 | ||||
Step and predictor | LL | UL | LL | UL | |||||||||||
1 | Constant | 2.57 | 2.09 | 3.05 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.03** | 2.50 | 2.02 | 2.992 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.02* | 0.03* |
Gender | 0.09 | –0.08 | 0.26 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.09 | –0.26 | 0.09 | 0.09 | –0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Age | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.09* | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.01 | –0.02 | –0.00 | 0.00 | −0.12** | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Children | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.34 | 0.09 | 0.09* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.16 | –0.02 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Working time | 0.01 | –0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Newcomer | 0.10 | –0.06 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.10 | –0.26 | 0.06 | 0.08 | –0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
2 | Constant | 1.59 | 0.89 | 2.29 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.09** | 2.97 | 2.29 | 3.66 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.14** | 0.13** |
Gender | 0.07 | –0.10 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.05 | –0.21 | 0.12 | 0.08 | –0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Age | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.09* | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.01 | –0.02 | –0.00 | 0.00 | −0.10* | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Children | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.36 | 0.09 | 0.10* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | –0.13 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Working time | 0.00 | –0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.00 | –0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | –0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Newcomer | –0.03 | –0.19 | 0.13 | 0.08 | –0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.16 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Autonomy | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.33 | 0.06 | 0.14** | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.19 | –0.31 | –0.07 | 0.06 | −0.12** | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Overtimea | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.16** | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.17** | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Interruptionsa | –0.01 | –0.12 | 0.10 | 0.06 | –0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | –0.08 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Lack of communication | –0.10 | –0.19 | –0.01 | 0.05 | −0.09* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.09 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Work environmentb | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 0.20** | 0.00 | 0.00 | –0.24 | –0.35 | –0.14 | 0.05 | −0.19** | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Information deficit | –0.09 | –0.19 | 0.00 | 0.05 | –0.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.15** | 0.00 | 0.00 |
N = 593–599.
Worded as advantage but coded reversely in the FGBU.
bWorded as disadvantage but coded reversely in the FGBU.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Gender: 0 = female, 1 = male; children: 0 = no, 1 = yes; newcomer: 0 = newcomer, 1 = experienced.
CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit.