Processed commodity | Number of valid studies a | Processing Factor (PF) | Compounds covered | Comment/Source | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual values | Median PF | ||||
Apples and pears, dry pomace | 3 | 2.86; 4.7; 5.04; | 4.7 | tetraconazole | Extrapolated from apples (EFSA, 2008) |
Apples and pears, juice | 5 | < 0.15; < 0.36; < 0.37;< 0.39; < 0.5 | < 0.37 | tetraconazole | Extrapolated from apples (EFSA, 2008) |
Apples, sauce | 1 | < 0.30 | < 0.30 | tetraconazole | Tentative b (EFSA, 2008) |
Apples and pears, wet pomace | 1 | < 0.77 | < 0.77 | tetraconazole | Tentative b , extrapolated from apples (EFSA, 2008) |
Grapes, juice | 1 | < 0.45 | < 0.45 | tetraconazole | Tentative b (EFSA, 2008) |
Grapes, must | 6 | < 0.28; 2 × < 0.34; < 0.40; < 0.45; 1.10 | < 0.37 | tetraconazole | (EFSA, 2008) |
Grapes, wine | 7 | < 0.12; 0.12; < 0.28; 2 × < 0.34; < 0.40; < 0.45 | < 0.34 | tetraconazole | (EFSA, 2008) |
Grapes, raisins | 3 | 1.42; 2.16; 3.26 | 2.16 | tetraconazole | (EFSA, 2008) |
Grapes, wet pomace | 2 | 4.14; 6.57 | 5.36 | tetraconazole | Tentative b (EFSA, 2008) |
Tomato, sauce | 1 | < 0.40 | < 0.40 | tetraconazole | Tentative b (France, 2021) |
Tomato, juice | 1 | < 0.20 | < 0.20 | tetraconazole | Tentative b (France, 2021) |
Tomato, preserve | 1 | < 0.20 | < 0.20 | tetraconazole | Tentative b (France, 2021) |
Cucurbits with inedible peel, peeled | 6 | < 0.19; < 0.43; < 0.71; < 0.75; < 0.94; < 1 | < 0.73 | tetraconazole | Extrapolated from melons (France, 2021) |
Rapeseed and linseed, cake | 4 | 0.41; 0.7; 1.06; 1.78 | 0.88 | tetraconazole | Extrapolated from rapeseed (EFSA, 2012) |
Rapeseed and linseed, crude oil | 4 | 1.32; 1.7; 2.55; 4.89 | 2.13 | tetraconazole | Extrapolated from rapeseed (EFSA, 2012) |
Rapeseed and linseed, refined oil | 3 | 1.27; 1.9; 5.67 | 1.9 | tetraconazole | Extrapolated from rapeseed (EFSA, 2012) |
Wheat, bran | 3 | < 0.25; 0.93; 1.68 | < 0.93 | TAA | France (2021) |
3 | 1.68; 2.09; 2.13 | 2.09 | TA, TLA | Residues of TLA < 0.01 mg/kg in raw and processed commodity in two out of the three studies (France, 2021). In these studies, LOQ of 0.01 mg/kg was used for TLA in raw and processed commodities for the calculation of the PFs. | |
Wheat, flour | 3 | 0.85; 1.55; 1.58 | 1.55 | TAA | France (2021) |
3 | 0.97; 0.98; 1.25 | 0.98 | TA, TLA | Residues of TLA < 0.01 mg/kg in raw and processed commodity in two out of the three studies (France, 2021). In these studies, LOQ of 0.01 mg/kg was used for TLA in raw and processed commodities for the calculation of the PFs. | |
Wheat, whole meal flour | 1 | 0.80 | 0.80 | TAA | Tentative b (France, 2021) |
1 | 0.92 | 0.92 | TA, TLA | Tentative b , residues of TLA < 0.01 mg/kg in raw and processed commodity (France, 2021). LOQ of 0.01 mg/kg was used for TLA for the calculation of the PF. |
PF: Processing factor (=Residue level in processed commodity expressed according to RD‐Mo/ Residue level in raw commodity expressed according to RD‐Mo).
Studies with residues in the RAC at or close to the LOQ were disregarded (unless concentration may occur).
A tentative PF is derived based on a limited data set.