Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 3;2:22. doi: 10.1186/s42836-020-00041-9

Table 2.

Comparison of rates and total volume of transfusion between two groups

Outcome Group Crude PS matching
Event/n OR (95% CI) p-value Event/n OR (95% CI) p-value
Rate of transfusion Group I 8/45 0.949 (0.411, 2.190) 0.903a 8/45 0.754 (0.212, 2.686) 0.754b
Group C 41/221 9/45
Mean ± SD p-value Mean ± SD p-value
Volume of transfusion (mL) Group I 35.56 ± 77.33 0.602c 35.56 ± 77.33 0.791c
Group C 43.44 ± 94.94 40.00 ± 80.90

PS propensity score

ap-value by simple Logistic regression; bp-value by conditional Logistic regression with adjusted variables in Table 1, cp-value by student’s t test