Table 2.
Comparison between this work and others already reported in the literature that use TiO2@MOFs for the photodegradation of MB, DIC, and IBP
| Pollutant | MOF | Titanium precursor | TiO2 loading (wt.%) | Radiation source | Catalyst concentration (mg L−1) | Pollutant concentration (mg L−1) | Removal efficiency (%) | Sample designation | SSA (m2 g−1) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MB | MIL-100(Fe) | TTIP | ND | 400 W Hg | 600 | 40 | 54.7 (without H2O2) | TM/5 | 120 | [34] |
| 88B(Fe) | NH2-MIL-TBT | 13.7 | 5 W LED | 200 | 100 | < 40 (without H2O2) | SU-3 | ND* | [35] | |
| HKUST-1 | TiO2 | ND | 300 W Xe | 500 | 20 | 91 | 0.02TiO2@HKUST-1 | 982 | [38] | |
| HKUST-1 | TTIP | ND | Hg–Xe | 3000 | 127 | ND | TiO2@Cu3BTC2 | 120 | [90] | |
| HKUST-1 + CuFe2O4 | TTIP | ND | UV-A | 200 | 31.6 | 82.6 | CuFe2O4/TiO2/CuBTC | ND | [91] | |
| MIL-101(Cr) | TBT | 13.8 | UV-A | 1000 | 20 | > 99 | TiO2-MIL-101 | 531 | [92] | |
| MIL-100(Al) | TTIP | 68 | 9 W/78 UV-A | 200 | 10 | 90 | TiO2@MIL-100(Al) | 417 | This work | |
| DIC | MIL-100(Al) | TTIP | 68 | 9 W/78 UV-A | 200 | 10 | 55 | TiO2@MIL-100(Al) | 417 | This work |
| IBP | MIL-100(Al) | TTIP | 68 | 9 W/78 UV-A | 200 | 10 | 62 | TiO2@MIL-100(Al) | 417 | This work |
TBT titanium(IV) butoxide, ND not defined